In my system and for my taste I feel the AZ MC2 is far better than the D60.
About a year ago I concluded a test in which I compared the D60, Cardas L15, Mapleshade Clearview double Helix, AZ MC2 and Virtual Dynamics Nite. The D60 sounded the least refined of the bunch and was at times grainy. The D60, Helix and L15 all had compressed dynamics and soundstaging compared to the MC2 and Nite.
To this day I still have the Nite and MC2, and the MC2 is currently in my system. Many people place great importance on obtaining a digital cable that is a true 75 ohm design, but I greatly preferred the 110 ohm MC2 and "non-digital" Nite to some of the other more correct designs.
I guess you just never know, because that crazy guy Viggen found that a Cardas Golden Cross analogue IC worked very well as a digital cable in his system.
With my gear the MC2 and Nite both create a huge soundstage and sound more open than the other cables I tried.
About a year ago I concluded a test in which I compared the D60, Cardas L15, Mapleshade Clearview double Helix, AZ MC2 and Virtual Dynamics Nite. The D60 sounded the least refined of the bunch and was at times grainy. The D60, Helix and L15 all had compressed dynamics and soundstaging compared to the MC2 and Nite.
To this day I still have the Nite and MC2, and the MC2 is currently in my system. Many people place great importance on obtaining a digital cable that is a true 75 ohm design, but I greatly preferred the 110 ohm MC2 and "non-digital" Nite to some of the other more correct designs.
I guess you just never know, because that crazy guy Viggen found that a Cardas Golden Cross analogue IC worked very well as a digital cable in his system.
With my gear the MC2 and Nite both create a huge soundstage and sound more open than the other cables I tried.