Audio Forums, On-line Store Fronts, and the Art-of-Deception


I have absolutely no problem with dealers on Forums in general; in fact, I think they perform a very important role in providing information to buyers about their product and insights about the competition. The key is to maintain full disclosure and an environment that encourages open discourse.

However, I am curious as to whether other members of our hobby have observed "supposed" Audio Forums that in reality are nothing more than a store-front for the Forum owner's equipment dealership which, in turn, uses business practices established to cloak the owner's profit objectives to appear as unbiased forum commentary. Do others feel this way or am I seeing things wrong?

I see the approach going something like this:

1) Start an Audio Forum with a few colleagues to help with the scheme;
2) Have the owner run large amounts of audio gear through their room for very short auditions to create the "appearance" of a knowledge-base to be used, in turn, to create the "appearance" of credibility regarding the advice offered by the Owner on the forum;
3) Have the Owner's colleagues play the role of shills, cheering the Owner's advice and the unsuspecting member's purchases from the store-front, as the Owner goes about denigrating the product he doesn't sell and lauding the product he does; 
4) Run the Forum in a manner that immediately quashes anyone who challenges the absurdity of the Owner's comments by shutting down threads and banning all challengers to the absurdity under the guise of keeping the forum a friendly place to exchange objective views.

I obviously consider this business model to be.....(well I won't use the words I am thinking). I would like to say, however, I do find humor in the ignorance of the approach strictly as a commercial enterprise.  

Sadly, I believe these types of business practices are often used on less sophisticated customers in today's retail world, but high priced audio gear is typically purchased by fairly astute individuals. As such, the model I describe above is the opposite of what an intelligent business person would develop to serve a sophisticated customer base. Yet we see this kind of nonsense employed in an attempt to sell sophisticated products to sophisticated people.

Maybe it just shows brains, business acumen, and ethics go hand-in-hand.

In the mean-time, a word of caution to all those fellow hobbyists looking for an objective advice on line; it is more important than ever to remember the time-tested cliches:

--caveat emptor
--follow the money
--things are not always as they appear

and so on.






wattsperchannel

Showing 6 responses by geoffkait

Shill Free Zone? There is no discernible difference between shilling and enthusiasm. Get over it. Maybe we should have name tags for Shills, Trolls, Pseudo Skeptics and Enthusiasts.

UCLA and Under Armour just closed on a $280 million deal. That’s $280 million Under Armour pays UCLA to wear their shoes and uniforms for the next 15 years. Is that wrong?

wattsperchannel OP
81 posts
05-25-2016 5:41pm
"geo, Dude get a clue. A shill acts in a deceitful way screwing the unsuspecting buyer through a con."

An enthusiastic audiophile can sometimes appear to be a shill. He praises the device or cables or whatever, even over praises it.  So, there’s frequently no discernible difference between an enthusiastic audiophile and a shill. But the enthusiastic audiophile is not shilling. If you perceive someone is shilling a product you can always ignore the post, one supposes.

knghifi
1,408 posts
05-30-2016 4:26pm
@bifwynne,

"Agon is a FREE INTERNET OPEN ACCESS website, do you understand what that means? For all we know, you can be a dealer or Queen of England ... Members can identify themselves but without a thorough bad ground check, it’s meaningless."

Can one assume a "bad ground check" is a Freudian slip?

But seriously, who cannot like sites like this and say AA and Stereophile? It’s the action. Hel-loo! 



Technically the correct saying is, "the love of money is the root of all evil." Which is a different sentiment from "money is the root of all evil."