A fixed frame screen will always outperform a retractable screen and will be considerably cheaper. If you could possibly do this, I would highly recommend it. You don't have to spend $4K for a fixed frame model. I paid $1700 for my 110" 16:9 Luxus Deluxe Firehawk from a local dealer. If you have any ambient light or have light colored walls or ceiling the Firehawk is outstanding. I evaluated several screen samples before buying the Firehawk. I think it is the best of the "gray" screens, though Grayhawk is also pretty good. However, in an ideal environment with no ambient light and all dark surfaces, I would chose a gain of 1 white screen over it, due to better color and brightness uniformity. Stewart is really good about sending out samples, though it may take a while to get them. You should get samples from each manufacturer before you make a decision.
Anybody with Stewart FireHawk Screen?
Anyone having the motorized retractable ones and have owned them for more than a year? What are your comments on the picture quality and on the screen developing ripples?
They have claimed the FireHawk will be able to work in ambient light situations which is interesting. And also, retractable pull-down screens are often claimed to have the disadvantage of developing ripples and uneveness. Will this be the same with the much touted Stewart screens?
Your replies may cause me to burst my budget for going for this expensive screen. Thanks.
They have claimed the FireHawk will be able to work in ambient light situations which is interesting. And also, retractable pull-down screens are often claimed to have the disadvantage of developing ripples and uneveness. Will this be the same with the much touted Stewart screens?
Your replies may cause me to burst my budget for going for this expensive screen. Thanks.