Tekton Double Impacts


Anybody out there heard these??

I have dedicated audio room 14.5x20.5x9 ft.  Currently have Marantz Reference CD/Intergrated paired to Magnepan 1.7's with REL T-7 subs.  For the vast majority of music I love this system.  The only nit pick is that it is lacking/limited in covering say below 35 hz or so.  For the first time actually buzzed the panel with an organ sacd. Bummer.  Thought of upgrading subs to rythmicks but then I will need to high pass the 1.7's.  Really don't want to deal with that approach.

Enter the Double Impacts.  Many interesting things here.  Would certainly have a different set of strengths here.  Dynamics, claimed bottom octave coverage in one package, suspect a good match to current electronics.

I've read all the threads here so we do not need to rehash that.  Just wondering if others out there have FIRST HAND experience with these or other Tekton speakers

Thanks.
corelli

Showing 50 responses by evolvist

@vitop ....Wow, so the mini Ulfs ARE taller than the DIs. Do you know the HxWxD of these mini Ulfs?

@vitop I’m in Houston. Where can these be heard?

I think I might have pinged you on another forum, actually. Ha!

These mini-Ulfs sound exciting, as well. It would be great if I could hear the DIs, though, as I’ve never heard them, but ready to pull the trigger (at least I think I am).

@Corelli
...Yeah, my only reservation is whether to spring for the Electons or the Mini-Ulfs. My room is 13x12x8, so the larger models might not be optimal.

It’s just only that when @vitop mentioned Houston, and some available to audition my ears perked up. It’s always at least a fun excursion going to audition speakers. :-)
Hey @Bullitt5094 I'm in Houston. Jersey Village, in fact. It's the DI I'm looking to hear, but I have no idea how to PM on here. Haha. 

I'm an HAS member, but I don't go to too many meetings. Dullsville. Haha. 

Can you PM me? 
Hey, thanks guys! 

I had no idea that Raven Audio was an hour and 20 minutes away from my home. I had read nothing but good things about their tube amps. 

I'll give him a shot and @david_ten I'll try your PM suggestion. Thanks! 

Wow, so I finally read through all 32 pages. It was quite a read and quite a journey for many of you (this is after reading many more pages on other forums). Wheew!

So, yeah, I’ll get to audition the DIs on Wednesday or Thursday of this week, thanks to @Bullitt5094. If I like them, I can’t see me NOT making the immediate leap to the mini-Ulfs. Any objections?

A couple of things, @lancelock I, too, have the Benchmark AHB2 amp. I’ve long subscribed to the "gain with wire" theory. Did you ever go back to driving the DIs with just the AHB2 to see how it sounds?

Now, I realize that SS gear adds its own harmonics, usually of the less desirable even-order; however, with a THD+N of 0.00013% (verified independent of Benchmarks own numbers), any imparted distortion and undesirable harmonics would be well below human hearing.

It’s just me riffing. Plus, that’s a lot of quality watts coming out of the ABH2.

Speaking of watts, I’m surprised that nobody has spoken of using Decware tube gear with the DIs. I mean, we’re talking about highly lauded tube amps, in configurations to meet most of the tube hungry crowd. Made in the USA, too, baby! I don’t own any Decware amps, but I’ve always been curious.

@grannyring I also wanted to comment on the Lyngdorf stuff. It’s great, isn’t it? I’m glad you’re getting good results with the DIs. With the room correction in the Lyngdorf, do you feel it does everything you need it to do in order to hear the speakers and not the room? Myself, I took a similar path, albeit one that cost me an arm and a leg, with the Linn KDS/3. That’s the latest Linn streamer/DAC/Preamp combo. It’s the same principle, to keep signal digital until the last possible moment. Another real benefit is that you can go straight RJ45 from your router, keeping the packets perfect and uncolored, instead of going USB with something else in the middle. It also has room correction, called "Space Optimization" which is done without a mic.

Anyway, out of trying many DACs: Chord, MSB, Trinity, dCS, Schiitt and Metrum, this was not only the best sounding DAC out of all of them, but also with the added features of all-of-the-above, it really turned my crank.

I’m now using Audio Physic Avanti 30th Anniversary Jubilee speakers.

I think that’s about to change, though. :-)



P.S. - I just wanted to thank everybody in this thread for their 2 cents. Everybody has been real class acts. You've brought a lot to the table and made yourselves available.

@lancelock , yeah, if you could, check it out...though I wonder - It’s like the rep from Benchmark said - the AHB2 is only as good as the source you’re amplifying. I have no idea what sort of DAC your use, but I’m curious.

I’ve never been anti-tube for speaker listening, but I am for headphone listening, having never found a tube amp that didn’t render the audio a bit flubby. Again, that’s with cans, only. Myself, I’ve actually learned a lot about tube gear from reading this thread. But, I guess you’ve got to crawl before you can walk, so I had best audition the DI first.

@Corelli , thanks for making this thread happen.


Edit: Whoops, above in my long ass post, I meant to type "odd order harmonics" are not what's desirable in most SS amps
 

@david_ten  I 've heard the M12, yes, only after I purchased my KDS/3, though. A good friend of mine is a Bricasti dealer and he offered me one well under retail. I thought it sounded very nice. The dual mono design really makes a difference.

What's ultimately enchanting about the KDS/3, however, is it's doing what Chord is doing in two different boxes, in one box + streamer, getting out of the USB path. At 16x RBCD, in the Linn and Chord FPGAs, in theory you're now closer to rendering 16-bit audio than ever before. In that respect, I don't give a hang about DSD, unless it's a unique mastering that was transferred to DXD then DSD. These are rare.

Anyway, I'm getting OT, but, you're probably right about the mini-Ulf. That is to say, if the DIs are all what they're cracked up to be, then the mini-Ulfs should be a no-brainer.

Like yourself, I have never made the jump to tubes.

And @grannyring like the Lyngdorf, Linn is largely overlooked this side of the pond. I've heard the 2170 and I thought it was a fantastic product that does a remarkable job.

I look forward to using Linn's Space Optimization on either the DI or the mini-Ulf, should one fit the bill. I mean, all of these voice in this thread, with so many different tastes in music, downstream gear, and experience can't be wrong.

One thing I've noticed, though, is that nobody has mentioned heavy mental of hip-hop with the DIs. Now, I'm not a metal head, nor do I listen to a bunch of hip-hop. I'm more of a classic rock, small ensemble chamber music, classic jazz, acoustic guitar, prog-rock music lover, but it isn't beyond me to put on some Metallica, Maiden and Beastie Boys from my youth. :-)

@lancelock  thank you for the assessment. It's very much appreciated. I had no doubt that many of the tube amps mentioned here did a great job. I was just trying to get a feel for something that's a little closer to home.

Funny thing, I'm actually bringing my AHB2 over to try out the DIs in an audition tonight.

Cheers!

Oh, and let me add that the highlight of my listening experience was Hendrix's "Voodoo Child (Slight Return)." Hendrix's guitar was crisp and taunt, batting back and forth between both speakers, his voice so clean in the middle. It was amazing. 

***THIS IS WHAT I WROTE LAST NIGHT***


Well, I just came back from @Bullitt5094 house, having experienced the Double Impacts for the first time.

The whole experience was very cool, and Bullitt is a super nice guy with a way cool home theater system. Being that his DI rig doubles as a both HT and 2 channel listening, he gets a lot out of these speakers. I was even offered beer! Outstanding!

So, listening to the DIs my first impression was, "These are bright!"

But wait! - Bullitt is way too critical of his own gear (contrary to his belief, his gear isn’t bad at all), yet at the same time I had brought my amp, the aforementioned Benchmark AHB2.

So, we’re like, "Okay, let’s see if the amp makes a difference."

Firstly, we hooked the amp up and the music was coming out in a very weak mono. Not even really mono, as some of the instruments were missing in the mix. Little did I know, my own amp has a mono/stereo switch and it was accidently flipped.to mono.

Secondly, the DIs were not bright anymore. An evenness grew from the DI’s soundscape that further clarified things. Bullitt expected this would be the case, and he was right, really justifying his recent purchase of a new pre and amp that’ll be in soon. So, it was great because he got to hear a bit of the sound that he should expect when his new kit comes in.

As for me, I got to hear a great deal of the DIs and I was impressed. Talk about slam! This was some voodoo stuff! Boy, those mids came out great with the AHB2 in the pocket.

HOWEVER...I’m not quite convinced yet, which is why we have plans to bring them over to my place, in a much smaller room, running from my Linn KDS/3 -> AHB2 -> Double Impacts. Remember, my Linn has Space Optimization, which is a unique room correction that doesn’t use a mic. So, you measure the speakers by distance from various locations in the room, tell it what the floor is made of, the walls, windows, etc, etc, and it takes the room out of the equation, as opposed to getting readings from a much more fallible mic setup.

At any rate, we’re having fun with it. It was a blast! In fact, a couple of days ago I shipped away my Audio Physic speakers, so I don’t really have speakers at the moment, but I’m picking up some Dynaudio 340s as loaners until I get what I want. These Dyns are no slouch speakers, so I should have them just in time to do a shootout between Bullitt’s DIs and the Dyn 340s (which, by the way, have been measured by Linn for ultimate optimization). In others words, the Dyns will be fully optimized, and we’ll kind of wing it with the DIs. So if the DIs win, this is a very good sign.

Otherwise... @vitop, are you saying that the mini Ulfs will be taller, but thinner, than the full sized Ulfs? The full sized Ulf are 7’3"! Anyway, you should get them in so that when I roll by San Antonio to pick up the Dyns, I can stop by your crib to listen to your mini Ulfs. Haha. :-)

@Vitop ...Well, if Eric considers the Ulfs to be the best speaker that he's ever made then I'm thinking why not get the best, yeah? There would be no need to pussyfoot around with the DI/Electrons if there's another model higher that's still in an affordable range.

At the same time, if Bullitt's DIs blow my socks off with my gear, in my room, I might just go with the DIs. They certainly would stand like sentinels in my room, though.

Choices, choices...

Off topic, I know, but it's all in the ear of the beholder. It also takes into account furnishings, surface hardness of walls, windows, ceilings, floors, and in a lot of cases Linn has measurements of the speakers in use. Not the DIs, of course. 

Sure, this methodology has caused some controversy, but it must be heard to be believed, first, much like the DIs. 
Because you're relying on the quality of the mic, plus the ability to capture the readings in what is often, but not always, a USB interface at worst, or a small pro-audio ADC at best. Because of the above factors, not failing to mention the variable quality of the software in use, I've seen readings taken in the exact same spot of the room have differing curves from one reading to the next. 

Therefore, as audio is a game of inches, where most of us try to squeeze the last bit of sound out of our gear, within our means, this variance can be too much when dealing with small frequencies and time. 

I believe it took a radically different approach to room correction in order to allow the adjustments in the environmental domain as opposed to the theoretical, captured by like software, yet with too many variables to be as precise. 

@grannyring I've experienced that one-box solutions like the Lyngdorf and DEQX have better results rather than shoehorning a solution into a computer, fed through software that integrates into a third-party software like JRiver and Roon.

I'm not saying that these DSP boxes and software with mics don't work, nor do I know everything about room correction. I don't. It just so happens that I have some experience, but that doesn't mean anything. It's experience, yet it's limited to my personal optic.

That said, over on the Linn forum there are a few users who use Space Optimization who do final tweaks in other software with a mic.That being the case, you can see that some Linn users feel that Space Optimization is not the be-all-end-all. It's probably not. The only thing that I was pointing out were some of the trappings inherent in a mic solution.

Also, because I use one solution that I own doesn't mean that I have some sort elitist complex. That's far from it. I don't care what the gear is, as long as the user gets the desired results for them. That's all that matters, is listen with happiness. :-) 

The Lyngdorf is certainly exceptional value. 

On another note, I cannot wait to hear the Double Impacts again. I have no idea what to expect in my environment, but...I don't know. Will it sound good?!!! I'm favoring, yes. 
@kdude66 , no, I don't know when the review is going to be posted. It should be soon. 

Yeah, you're right about the crossovers and such. Whatever I end up with I'm going to pretty much play them 24/7 for awhile. 
I just read a really good review on the Electrons. It’s not posted yet, so I can’t cite the text yet; nevertheless, yeah, we’re talking the same sentiments that the Electrons fight well above their class against speakers that are 3 to 4xs as much.

One of the main themes of his review is to let them break in, as he wasn’t a fan right out of the box.

I have mixed feelings about speaker break in. I know there is a small physical element to speaker break in, perhaps 25-50 hours, but perhaps the rest is the ear/brain connection. But, I mean, I really don’t know. I had some full range single drivers once that I let play for 200hrs and I couldn’t tell the difference from before and after.

Still, in this case with the Electrons the guy is pretty happy!
I know this question has at least been partially touched upon, but I wonder if there is a consensus, to wit, how far is optimal placement of the DIs from the front wall? 

I generally have no more than 2ft or so from the front wall to work with, and roughly 2ft from the side walls if I'm to keep about 6.5ft between the speakers. 

My good friend Bullitt's DI were less than a foot from the front wall it seemed, yet I didn't hear anything too amiss in his setup. In fact, I emailed him today and told him I was jonesing to hear them again. Haha. Maybe with his new Schitt DAC he'll be getting in this week. 

But yeah, what is your experience with placement? 

Interesting that Terry brings this up. I happen to be going over to Raven Audio tomorrow to check out their tube amps, as well as hearing their DIs. :-)


They are even letting me bring my AHB2 to compare their amp against mine, into the DIs. How's *that* for customer service?!

Dave seems like a cool guy!

@teajay , will do!

Also, I noted your enthusiasm over the Role Enterprise speakers. How would you say those hold up to the DIs?

Speaking of the AHB2...

I went to the Raven Audio shop today, courtesy of Dave Thomson, the owner.

Raven is in Onalaska, Texas, about 80 miles north of Houston, where it was a trip well made.

Meeting Dave was a fantastic experience, as we waxed on about the intricacies of sound reproduction, SS vs. tubes, and of course the Double Impacts, as well as the Legacy Audio speakers he carries. Dave was even gracious enough to allow me to bring my Benchmark AHB2 amp to compare with his own amps.

The DIs that Dave has are not the upgraded model, and he maybe has 50-60 hours on them, still, they sounded rather good, yet I don't think sitting only 6ft away from speakers is for me. I think I have my own sweet spot where the sound pressure is pretty mild, even cranked to some hefty levels (don't we all?) Nevertheless, his DIs served as a fantastic conduit to compare the AHB2 along side his Osprey and Blackhawk amps.

To tell the truth, the AHB2 didn't give an inch of ground in its grip on the drivers, neither did it sound colored, nor did it have any peaks nor valleys. It performed great. Then again, the Osprey and the Blackhawks didn't have the aforementioned traits, either, that would get in the way of the music. Indeed, the amps sounded very much alike, which is a testament to Raven Audio tube amps in that there isn't a single hint of flubbyness, bloat or syrup from his tube gear. Dave's amps did, however, impart a sense of ease: a nebulous sparkle to the music, yet with no coloration, and they were as quick as can be. When I'm talking fast, I'm talking very fast!

I came close to opening my wallet.

Then came the Legacy speakers. Well, really only one floated my boat, the Focus SE, but I believe it would be too much for my 13x12x8 room. The DIs, on the other hand, required no room treatment. Indeed, they were situated only 10" from the front wall, with the side walls being unequal, in pretty much an open space. So, hey, the DIs held their own. They are certainly easy to place.

So, yeah, I might just open my wallet yet at a Raven Audio piece. Good stuff!

As for the DIs? Right now I'm weighing my options since there is no shortage of time. I'm studying and still getting the lay of the land, leaning heavy toward Tekton, even the full blown DIs for my small room, because they're so easy to place and dial in.

@waltersalas , so you ended up keeping the Double Impacts over the Daedalus Ulysses, or was it too much of a toss-up, or did you keep both?

I'm sorry if you already answered the question definitively, and I missed it, but there is a lot of stuff to read in this thread. :-)

@muzikmann, if they are the adapters made by Benchmark I've not been able to detect any degradation.

https://benchmarkmedia.com/collections/cables/products/benchmark-rca-to-xlrm-adapter-cable

I've had prior experience with other adapters of this sort, and I didn't like them, yet although these Benchmark cables are light, they sure do the trick for my ears...and my ears are anal (which sounds really weird when I write that out). 

@Mac48025, interesting about noise with the Blackhawk. Did you let Dave know what you were hearing and did he happen to say anything about it? 

I'm curious, because I don't want to go down the Blackhawk path if I'm going to have problems that can't be remedied under warranty. When I heard the Blackhawk they cranked with no noise at all. 
@333jeffery, two things:

1.) How are your Ulfs doing? Have they they settled in yet? You think they’re still that much of a difference between the DIs, say, the DIs are about 70% of the Ulfs?

2.) It might sound like I’m biased, but I swear I’m not. The D-Sonic amps from Houston, Texas kick the hell out of the NAD gear, for a much lower price. Even if, let’s say, both amps were sonically on par, you’re still looking at a much lower cost with an incredible build from the D-Sonics, to boot. I matched up my AHB2 with the D-Sonic amp, and there wasn’t much of a difference in instrument separation, bass-grip, and headroom up to about 100 watts. The only supposed knock on Class D amps, to me, is that they are switching amps, and they just don’t switch fast enough to not futz with the incoming signal. That is to say, if one buys into the science of upsampling to reconstruct the original wav, like I do, then you’re defeating a little bit of the sonic purpose. I liken it to not quite letting the full flow of a water out of your garden hose, though that’s what you require to water the lawn.

On the other hand, it’s highly suspect that the human ear can hear the difference with a switching amp disallowing small trickles of water at a time. Then again, if water was missing but one molecule, it would no longer be water, and the same could be said for accurate reproduction of sound.

You have a Schitt Yggy, right?
Okay, so...I made another trip over to Bullitt's house to hear his new Schitt DAC, as well as his new speaker placement. His system is really starting to come into its own for two-channel. When I put my ABH2 in again, the sound just bloomed once more. This will be a good indicator of what his rig will sound like when he gets his new tube-pre and amp in. What's more, he's also getting the Double Impact Special Editions (SE), so I would expect big things from his system.

It was at Bullitt's house that I realized that I had never been unconvinced of the DI's sound, only that with the thought of the mini-Ulfs floating around my gourd. So,do I go for broke with a $7500 slightly ugly pair of speakers that I've never heard, or do I get some DIs and possibly always wonder what I'm missing? 

Not only that, but I wonder how much of a compromise the mini-Ulfs will be against their bigger brother. I just don't have the space for the full-sized Ulfs. I'm thinking, there's no way Eric gets the 12" woofers into the minis. From my understanding, the mini-Ulfs will be 5'3" tall, depth 15" and a width of...damn, I forgot the number and it's written on a piece of paper somewhere. I'm tempted to say that Eric said 10.5". That would be the width of the Electrons.

At any rate, if I don't make up my damn mind soon, that will be even more time without speakers, as these assuredly take a long time to come in. Lord know I would have to order the mini-Ulfs with grills. :-)
@david_ten , well, I hope I don’t raise any hackles here. :-) Heh. But Merrill can put all of the fancy wire they want in their amps, all of the bling, hyperbole and superlatives into their amps, but it’s still a switching amp no matter how you slice it. It’s still a gate of sorts to the signal you’re sending it.

To be fair, though (as if there is really such a concept), I’m over here thinking about tube amps for the first time in my life which obviously adds distortion to the signal that I’ve spent so many dollars to protect. Even beyond that, in the probably futile search of "a wire with gain," my current AHB2, even with a distortion profile way below human hearing, still uses tons of negative feedback to get it done, thus it doesn’t have an optimal dampening factor. We can go even further and say that many, of not most, SS amps adds crazy even order harmonics that is simply not natural to most instruments.

So, yeah, there are trade-offs everywhere. Nobody has a bead on perfection.

That said, can I hear a gated effect in a Class D amp? The answer is no, I cannot. It's all academic. :-)
Just for the record, I have nothing against Class D amps. In fact, I have nothing against anything in the audio world unless the sound turns me off. 
@James_w514, yeah, you know, that 8" driver is probably not optimal for large rooms. Mine is small, at 13x12x8, so I figured I would go for it, especially since bass is so hard to control and also difficult to articulate right with a sub. There are usually big tradeoffs somewhere in the design. Rationally, I ciphered that with my room size I'll get the bass articulation of the DI's dual 10", but perhaps without some of the struggles. 

Meh, if worse comes to worse and I fall crazy in love with the mini-Ulfs, yet I find bass to be lacking, I have this JL F110 sitting here collecting dust that I could really dial in to dip pretty low. The JL has room correction so it shod dial in nicely, and though it's a 10", itself, it sounds much deeper and goes much deeper, with great authority. Perfect for a smaller room. 

At least that's what I imagine at the moment...or we'll see. 
Nah, Bill. I mean he says it's the best. 

63.5" tall, 15" deep, 10 1/8" wide. 

Not the 12" bass drivers, but 8". 

I ordered mine today. 

The worst case, I'm out $300 in shipping. The best case, I have some speakers that blow me away. 

I'm in. 
@teajay , ah, so you don't actually own a pair of DIs? The price must have been too steep what with all of those amp purchases. Heh. 
Bullitt, 

We certainly shall see. If these things take a month to get to me, I'm pulling out, though. I'm not going to sit around and wait for months on end. 

I know it sounds like a hard line, but a month is about standard for a custom build from my experience. I mean, I don't have anyone to protect here but me. 

That said, I'm super excited about the mini-Ulfs. I want these things. I have to talk to Eric today anyway; I want to give him another CC to charge, so I'll see if I can narrow him down to the configuration, which I should have done yesterday. We know it's two 8" wooofers per cab, and that the tweeter config is the same as the larger Ulfs. The question is, how many mid/bass driver per. 

I have a feeling these speakers are going to smoke! 
Yeah, 15 tweeters (3 super tweeters?), four (4) 3" "harmonic overtone" drivers, and two (2) 8" bass driver per cab. At least that’s my understanding.

An interesting thing is, within a few miles of me (80 miles at the extreme distance) there will be two sets of mini-Ulfs, one pair of Ulfs and a pair of DIs.

I imagine from there we will glean a rather keen study of what’s what.

Really, I don’t know what to expect.

On one hand there is the fear that there will be a big compromise in sound from the Ulfs to the mini-Ulfs. After all, the minis are less expensive, and it would be a big cheat for the Ulf owners to have paid $12k while the mini-Ulf owners paid $7.5k. Yet, on the other hand, there have been two Electron owners that I know of who say that the Electrons sound just like the DIs, only they can fit in smaller places. They are in full DI bloom within a smaller area.

That is seldom the case when going from the larger version of one speaker to a smaller version. The only example I can think of where a speaker manufacturer pulled that off was the Horning Eufrodite compared to the smaller Aristotles, i.e. half of the size, for a half of the room size without a loss in SQ. There are perhaps some full range single drivers that can do the same, but that’s a whole other barrel of monkeys.

So, what is one getting with the mini-Ulfs? I haven’t the foggiest. Only a rough idea. Will it be a $4200 difference in SQ compared to the DIs? A 30% increase? A 20% increase? 5%? I know in this crazy audiophile world people have paid a lot more than $4200 for a 1 or 2% increase. Increments on this level don’t come cheap.

I suppose I will find out, though.
@mac48025, thank you for your response. It makes plenty of sense. It's also pretty cool that we have the guy who purchased the first DIs in here. Didn't you write that yours are serialized 1 & 2?

Perhaps you're right. I need patience. Only patience is a virtue that takes too long to cultivate. :-) 
@james_w514, I used to own EgglestonWorks Andra IIs. Very fine speakers. In fact, exceptional. I guess like everyone else, though, if I didn't like them enough to keep them I wouldn't be here right now.

That's not entirely true. 

I'm not the kind to get restless, always trading something in for something else, in love with the chase rather than the kill.

I suppose I'm looking for that speaker set that reminds me enough of headphones from top to bottom.

Once I got the Focal Utopia cans, I had reached the top of of what headphones can do. I want my speakers to get as close to evenness that the FUs got me, yet obliviously with the head, neck and chest connection of speakers. 

Tekton is pretty close in the running so far.
So does everyone on this forum own a $4000 headphone? :-)

Heh. Yeah, I have the Focal Utopias, but my 14-year old son does most of the listening to them through a Chord DAVE. That's too much gear for him, so I'm probably going to sell that stuff, since I don't really listen to cans anymore. 
@david_ten - As you know I’m into the best front end that I can afford. That’s why I went all-in with the Linn KDS/3, so not only am I looking for speakers that scale like headphones, but also they much bring out the beauty of my frontend.

As good as my recent Audio Physic Avanti 30th Anniversary speakers were, I thought that they imparted a little too much of their own coloration.

Of course every speaker is going to have its own sound, they way it conveys the music, etc., yet I’m sure we’ve all heard speakers that simply get in the way too much. In other words, there’s a "house sound" and then there’s an overt sound.

That’s why I didn’t dig on the Golden Ear Triton Reference. I think a lot of audiophiles have gotten used to slighting blured lower-mids, so much that it’s become acceptable.

I suppose that’s what attracts me to the mini Ulfs, at least is theory. I liked the unveiled microscopy of how the DIs let the music through. From there I could only guess that the mini Ulfs would go one better.

Yes, the mini Ulf’s size is a consideration for my smaller space, but also my experience with full range single drivers has very curious how these four (4) 3" "overtone" drivers will perform. After speaking with Eric I’m hoping these help blend more seamless with the tweeters and the woofs because of their size. I really don’t know, but from my nominal knowledge of how speakers work, I’m hoping the 3" as opposed to the 7" in the larger Ulfs will be more about finesse and integration of the lower-mids. I don’t need thump; I need accuracy.

But hey, maybe I’m off base. I’m sure the full-sized Ulfs are plenty accurate. I think one more notch up from the DIs should do.

I really need to know the crossover points in the minis. 
@pts - one-way shipping. Shipping to you is worked inro the cost of the speakers. If you don't dig her, you only have to eat the fee for her train ride back to Thailand. 
James, I think there's one Ulf owner and no mini Ulf owners, as of 08-11-2017. I could be wrong, though. But maybe those folks have Naim gear. 
Congrats on your purchase and enjoyment of the speakers! 

If you would, keep us informed of your progress with them. :-)
Say, this just dawned on me: the Ulfberhts have bass drivers at the top and the bottom.

Does anybody have a notion, a feel, or perhaps a little science of how this will effect the sound?

The top bass driver is above the line where the tweeters and mids should be pointed at your head, because from the looks of it, the listener will face a wall of mids and three tweeters, the last tweeter closer to the floor, pointed, where...closer to your crotch or knees?

I wonder how this plays out. I don’t have a clue. Just from looking it would seem that the image would be very even, or a complete mess. Jeffrey has them, though. He thinks they are aces.

@Vitop - You know, that’s very interesting, the concept about other models of loudspeakers not behaving like anything in nature. I’m not sure what kind of "curves" that Eric is talking about, but as we know with headphones, many of them are tuned certain ways to accentuate certain frequencies.

I’m not saying that’s the correct way of designing headphones and/or speakers, yet I’m reminded about the ear/brain connection and how the brain is more attracted to dynamic sounds as they occur in nature as opposed to mechanical ones. It’s much how the eye picks up the color green more than any other color due to our ancient ancestors living in jungle/wooded areas that were rife with predators. Anything that contrasted against green sent up a red flag, so to speak.

The point is, in my study of the ear/brain connection this harkens to the "Loudness Wars" and how dynamically the ear brain wants to reject the compromised, digitally compressed music that has been the rage over the last 20-years or so.

It makes me wonder, then, about Tekton’s patent and if it’s not simply a way to adjust the voicing to be more "natural." Therefore, is it the speaker’s responsibility to be as flat as possible, or is it a natural representation of sound that caters more to what the brain wants to decipher? I figure that a hi-fi speaker should yes, be surgical and resolving enough to hear the smallest nuances of the music, though what is a flat frequency response if not a graphical representation of what people have determined to be correct and true. They are mere plots on paper. Sure, there is merit in the study of frequency, despite how we all internalize certain frequencies in different ways. There are some of us who might loathe the sound produced by a trumpet, yet revel in the sound of a musical saw.

Here’s the trip: at Bob’s house I noticed that digitally compressed music was much more palatable voiced through the DIs. It made me wonder if the DIs are a more "natural" conduit - a champion of dynamism - that plays music more in the the way that people want to hear it versus the way we’re told *how* we must hear it.

I doubt that the Tekton "magic" occurs with wild peaks and slopes across the audible frequency band; however, with much talk of "overtones" and such, perhaps we’re giving the actual music a fighting chance here.
@Brotw - No we didn't use a tube pre, because I wanted to compare pure apples to oranges with SS versus tube. 

Nonetheless, I think the Blackhawk would supply plenty of power for your room size. We barely even touched the full power of what the Blackhawk can do. The 20w Blackhawk (I'm told) might just hit up into the 100-150wpc of a SS amp in a high efficiency speaker. I'm still trying to wrap my head around the concept, but that's what I heard, as well: ear bleeding levels in a pretty large room. 

Or call Raven up and inquire. 

Otherwise, what David said, yes. 

@Bullitt and @Vitop - The tube amps like the Blackhawk and ZOTL40 are self biasing, so there's no need to fiddle with that. Moreover, the tubes are said to at least give 50,000 hours, yet assuredly more, perhaps into the 100,000 range. That's 2,083 days, or 6 years if you played them straight through, at 50,000 hours. 

But let's say that you only use them 2 hours a day: that's well over 20 years. 

Do you want to live forever or something? :-)
Hey Kenny, I'm a little confused. Maybe you might be able to help me out, because I've seen different info here and there. 

Are the tweeters in the DIs Scanspeak or are they something else? 
So, you didn't mod them, right, Kenny? Those are the tweets that came in them?
@charles1dad  - Yeah, that's what I was getting at in a roundabout way, wondering about the tweeters in the mini-Ulf that I ordered. That is to say, I wonder if they are the upgraded Scanspeak tweeters, and I would hope so given the price I paid for the mini-Ulfs.

I emailed Tekton about it, but I received no reply.