New Audioquest cables equivalent to Audioquest to the old ones


My question what cables from the new line of Audioquest cables are comparable to dragon, sterling speaker cables, and diamond interconnect. Right now I have the Yukon ic which I really like.
Convert?fit=crop&h=128&policy=eyjlehbpcnkioje1mdyzntuxotysimnhbgwiolsicmvhzcisimnvbnzlcnqixx0%3d&rotate=exif&signature=9f7af9ff1709758ef7b4dc62f178b986882520f7abbaa5166c9b661c7f0b1b0c&w=128jayctoy
i find the entire aq line very confusing which is why I havent purchased them. 
I agree I got lost as well, they have too many new models came out....
No Audioquest cables are comparable to the more recent offerings with the DBS feature.  My entire system is wired with AQ cables.  All of my interconnects are DBS enabled.  My speaker cables are not.  DBS is such a game changer, I wish I could afford DBS speaker cables.  Also the recent designs are using FEP (teflon) tubes as the dielectric.  A big step toward ultimate neutrality.

I think the latest AQ interconnects using silver are superb. Wind and up the line from there. I'm sure the copper versions are good too. Best to just give them a try. 

I agree their silver are good...

Auditioned their Water XLRs...wasn't  thrilled. Cables were fully broken in yet still sounded edgy and fatigueing. Replaced them with much cheaper Grover Huffman's and they sounded way better in terms of musicality and just fun.
To decipher Audioquest cables go to their pricebook on their website where each model is spec'd from lowest to highest so that you can make true sense of the differences between models with corresponding retail pricing. It takes all confusion out. 

With interconnects (latest versions to the right; ballpark 1m list prices are in parenthesis):
WEL - no earlier equivalent, but multiple revisions
Wild (4500) - no earlier equivalent, but multiple revisions
Sky I (2200) > Sky II (2700) > Fire (3000)
Cheetah (1000) > Niagara (1750) > Wind (2000)
**PSS Silver above here; PSC+ Copper below**
Panther (600) > Colorado (900) > Earth (1100)
Jaguar (350) > Columbia (450) > Water (500)
**DBS above here; no DBS below**
King Cobra > Yukon

Even towards the bottom & left are decent cables, but as 4425 mentioned, the Wind on up are really excellent -- this is where real improvements can be easily discerned on high-resolution gear. I also find even the ancient Sky I to be within a few hairs’ width of the "excellent" level as well (much warmer than Wind, though).

With speaker cables, they’ve changed so much in geometry and metal mixes that this is a futile exercise.
@mulveling WEL was originally known as "Horizon". Same conductors and geometry but a navy blue braid. Maybe someone else had rights on that name because it got changed to WEL within a year or so of release
The new aq cost a lot more $$$$$$ and do cause even less harm.
Honestly I am still a fan of aq old cables, the dragon and sterling speaker cables, diamond ic, this cables do have excellent tonal balance, and 3 dimensional, even new rising star cables can't do it.