Cartridge to turntable price ratio


How much do you spend on a cartridge before you have more cartridge than turntable. For example if you spend $2500 on a turntable and tonearm how much maximum would you spend on a cartridge? $1000? 1500?  

128x128nikonnola

Lewn, then don't read/answer it then. I wasn't asking for thoughts on my question. Before these answers I was thinking of upgrading my turntable before I broke the $2000 price point on a cartridge.  Now probably not. I know the system including the tonearm comes into play. But I wanted to keep the conversation to cartridge and turntable. Thanks to the people whom responded.

Assuming you have a fundamentally solid well performing TT/ARM:

The cartridge's effect on the sound is FAR more important than a 'better' turntable.

No ratio, it's about MM or MC; Phono Stage and/or SUT; Tubes/SS; Cantilever stiffness; arm/stylus compliance compatibility; Stylus shape (groove contact/life; specs: tracking weight; wide channel separation; tight channel balance.

 

Why do I say the question is tedious or even meaningless?  Because if you admit the possibility for a pre-owned turntable (and by the way, the tonearm is at least as important), then you cannot pinpoint what "should be" the cost for a given cartridge.  Then, at least in my opinion, the best sounding cartridges are not in order of cost.  Many here seem to believe that there is a 1 to 1 ratio between SQ and what you pay; I emphatically do not. So, three of my favorite cartridges are vintage, and if you can find a sample, the cost would be well under $2000 for each.  Yet, I would readily mount any of those cartridges on any of the most expensive turntable/tonearm combinations, while also stipulating that no turntable/tonearm really needs to cost more than $25K (pre-owned) or maybe $40K if you insist on brand new. Beyond that, and you are paying for bling and pretence. You should not feel impeded or governed by cost ratios, at all. So why talk about it?