What are the sonic DISADVANTAGES of the 840c?


Hello again,
I have been reading, with interest, all the rave reviews of the Cambridge Azur 840c cd players sonics online, and on various forums.
Ok,
To those who have owned and then sold the 840c, or have listened to it, and did not care awhole lot for its sonics:
What are the sonic DISADVANTAGES of the 840c in comparison to higher priced and better built units?
In what ways is it not in the same league with the "big dogs"?
I am not trying to start an argument, I am just curious, so don't take this thread in the wrong way.
Thanks for your answers.
audio_girl

Showing 1 response by daltonlanny

I have owned the Rega Saturn, and have had the Esoteric DV-50, and the Marantz SA11S1 in my home at the same time as the Cambridge 840c.
Compared to the Rega Saturn, Esoteric DV-50, and Marantz SA11S1, I would say that the Cambridge is very slightly lacking in the 3 following areas:
1. Blackness between notes and a completely black background.
2.Imaging sometimes slightly vague, or images not as precise around the edges as the above mentioned players.
3. Very slight lift in the upper mids/lower treble.

Break-in was not an issue. My 840c has atleast 400 hours on it.
These differences were very small, but were audible to my ears. The 840c is still VERY competitive with any of them, especially at its price.