Differences between MAC C100, C200 and C46

Does anyone know the differences between the Macintosh C100, C200 and C46 preamps as far as the sound, imaging and soundsatge goes?

thanks

refreshscreen04-24-2004 3:19pm

larrman Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 17 posts 04-25-2004 at 09:46pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete I have the c200 and other than the difference in the displays and the HT passthrough it is the same as the c100. These are some of the best solid state preamps available. They are very transparent with great soundstaging. The c46 will get you very close however to the c100/200. If you can compare them with your own ears that should give you the best indication of perceived sound differences. Soundwise the c46 will get you well into the ballpark of the c100/200. Good luck.
larrman Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 17 posts 04-26-2004 at 03:02pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Hassel, I don't run a TT yet but I plan to get one. One of the reasons I bought the c200 was because I wanted the ability to run MC/MM and the c200 has excellent phono sections. All I'll ever need. Baldeagle, It's my understanding that any input can be assigned for pass through on the c200. Also the c200 is totally off when pass through is used. Volume is controlled from the A/V proc.