thank you guys, i will take your advice and give it a shot. i will say though, the 5002 is one tough cookie. it powered my infinity 2b's bottom end for 15 years and worked very well. i once swiched over to the 202+ for the bass and the bass output was cut in half. im not sure why,the soundcraftsmen has only a little more power then the 202+. i wasent expecting that. i dident think there was going to be really a difference at all. but it was like night and day, can anybody explain that??
b&k M200 mono amps over soundcraftsmen 5002
hello,
i have a soundcraftsmen 5002 driving my bass colums of my infinity 1b's. they sound great!! plenty of power for them and the amp dosent even break a sweat. i have a b&k 202+ for the mid/high panel and it also does very well. i have a chance to buy m200 monos and use on the bass panels. would this be an improvment over the 5002?? i hear these do well in the bass area. any thoughts??
i have a soundcraftsmen 5002 driving my bass colums of my infinity 1b's. they sound great!! plenty of power for them and the amp dosent even break a sweat. i have a b&k 202+ for the mid/high panel and it also does very well. i have a chance to buy m200 monos and use on the bass panels. would this be an improvment over the 5002?? i hear these do well in the bass area. any thoughts??