Attn Vinyl lovers - what CD Player do you use?


While reading through the many threads on Vinyl vs. CD, I thought it might be interesting to see what CD transports/players Vinyl fans use when not listening to their analog rig?
encyclopediabsh

Showing 8 responses by phillyb

Esoteric K-03. Sounds as good as my vinyl as long of course like my vinyl that I keep is well recorded and mastered. Neither format to me is better, it all gets back to the quality. I love my LP's covers, but I can enjoy music either way. I must say though that I don't follow trends or follow reviews. I use my own ears. No PC audio for me. I like the physical. I already have enough music to last me more than a life time.
This endless Digital vs. Analog is non stop. Having owned both I can say both can be excellent and bad. Much is in the mastering and recording quality to begin with. early digital was new so like early analog it had issues but those days are many years gone. You have digital with its power supply and output and DAC that gives you the final sound and they will give a signature like all electronics. Then analog has platter, arm, cartridge, and setup quality and each produce their own significant signature. The LP pressings sound different base on mother pressing used or backups, then who cuts the disc. Digital mastering used, tape quality and generation, care taken and who did the mastering. Both care must be taken and system matching and your room that impacts sound more that your gear. I keep reading the BS always pushed forth by phile and TAS where digital version sounded unlistenable while playing that CD I don't hear it. So it must be their system, or room. Can CD sound bad, yep, can a LP sound bad yep. The nice thing about vinyl is you can get the older pressing used and to me that was the intended sound that they worked on, with now the reissue of some they have messed with it, trying to make it better like they do in digital at times. I like neither. There was a golden age of recorded music mid 50's through mid 60's. Those recording sound real, great tone, color and body and guess what they sound as good on well mastered CD. Most rock acts 60's sounded bad on vinyl due to compression used and mixed for radio and not high end systems. So these same records will sound bad no matter the format. The great thing about digital and still today is the amount of recording available that you never find on LP's unless you for lucky at a garage sale and then if it was playable. I never purchased used LP' unless they looked mint as new and even then you find needle grove damage and noise. I enjoy them both and years of experience I know what to look for a both to give me a good idea to buy or not. My digital of choice as been Japanese because it is their design they invented and understand. My current and one I enjoy daily is the Esoteric K-01. This player gives it like the recording played. It can be tube warm or forward aggressive or dry based on the recordings. So that is a good thing. My vinyl can sound the same based on recording, VTA and phono preamp used and its settings. So care must be taken in all areas. I like the large LP covers, I like the feel of involvement, even the clicks and pops make vinyl what vinyl is. What I like about digital is that it is flat as in natural to the mastering, I would say more honest and if done with outstanding realism. But to get this you better clean your CD's take with set up and make sure your room is cared for and made for listening to a highend system. Most of all what I like is collecting physical music and streaming will never be some I would want to do. Though streaming of songs out sell by far LP and CD which still out sells LP's. What LP sales were in their prime out sold in a monthly what LP' today sell in a year. I am glad to see people playing their records again, but I also would say there is a lot of great music to be had on CD. So if you like to collect, enjoy listen to a whole recording and just you favorite tracks from streaming then keep supporting both formats. As boomers die sales will decline and even many like myself that own so much it getting harder and harder to find something I need or want to buy. I am not buying just to buy any longer, something as to be good and interesting to buy. The new Beatles 50th anniversary release coming and remixed will be worth it. Having heard cuts on other Beatles CD's these will tronce either the LP's and CD Sonic's. Its about time they started on this project, imaging and placement is superb and the brightness of many Beatle recordings will be helped. Now these LP' and CD's will be worth the cost. The Beatles recordings were not that well done, White Album was about the best if sonics are your priority, the mono's come no where near what America was doing sonically. Compare any 50's Mono's and late 50's stereo to any later rock recordings, they for the most part cannot touch the experts in recording that we had. So technology gives us the tools to improve and hopefully better mastering and remastering will continue to gives us better enjoyment of loved music and the upcoming Sgt. Pepper will be something to behold. 
Greg, i never enjoyed early Esoteric. The K series though really hit the mark. I will say best buy in a New CD player is Marantz Reference players, the new one is musical as the old one but more purity. I could live with any of them. The K01 is just more of everything. I like my vinyl and I like my digital I don't expect one to sound like other. When I read that crap in the magazines I laugh sounds more analog like, that is crap. Analog can sound many ways and as bright as a bad CD player or recording. Both formats you have to take care with setup, more electronics in a CD player so noise is a big thing like it is in preamps etc. Good power cords, great stand, clean your CD's and speaking that I've had many of the top ones and they made the sound different, some warmer to brighter. Go figure much like adjusting the VTA on a turntable go one way to far off it sounds bright, then the other was off to much bass. So much goes into your final sound like your room that any review is about worthless, you have to get the product in you own home, room and system. If people worked more on setup and their room they enjoy their system more. Sticking expensive speakers in corner or with gear and TV between them is a waste of money. Your audio system needs it own room and be dedicated to it and it alone. 
Nkonor,

I thought the British Blue Box was the best the Beatles sounded on vinyl. mobile Fidelity EQ them and I was not happy and really don't like a lot of their releases. Stones sounded better than any releases in Vinyl on the German Telefunken's label. In fact shocked me to hear them without all the reverb. Try to find original 1st pressings. They will always sound the best. 
Your right to have the turntable outside of your playing area. Not many know what of the nice effects of a turntable is it picks up the vibes and room in the reproduction and that gives it a special sound. On a good system just have someone cover the table with a cover, have the music playing and then lift the cover off, you will hear and feel it. Gives vinyl an acoustic feedback so to speak, your hearing your room. The Telefunken label may be long gone but google it. Your system should be about the music not the format nor gear. Gain the experience and you will know when good is good and then sit back and enjoy. I am finding more and more with cables and their off the wall designs are hurting music. Simple solid designs will do the trick, audio jewelry is just that, looks at sky high prices. By the way keep in my it was the Master tapes used and the pressing and cutting of the disc that made the Stones sound so good. To this when ever I hear Sympathy For Devil I feel sad, it sounds like crap compared to the Telefunken DMM pressing.
I have owned all Marantz reference players and all have been superb. The SA 10 will join that great group. This one with advances and design. 
Jafant, I have not. I own a Esoteric K01 so I am not searching for a new player, if I was and for the money my money would go to the Marantz. They are and have always been great sounding, dependable and well made and if a audiophile small company built it cost 3 times more.