ukthunderace
Responses from ukthunderace
| Help an old man out Headphone dreams/JJS, following your posts I went back and relooked the 390...it is definitely a consideration. Looks quality! | |
| Help an old man out JRW, thanks for the post...agree with you 100%. The S300 could drive the Gallos okay, but I wanted that headroom and control and the only way to go is up. How is soundstage comparatively between your M33 and your Prima Luna? The reviews I have... | |
| Help an old man out Not sure what WAF is, but I don’t see 88dB as very low sensitivity...middle of the pack at best. | |
| Help an old man out Everything is a little bit better - a little cleaner, a little airier, better imaging and a little better bass extensionexactly what I am looking for...all the reviews say the new Purifi Eigentakt puts class d in new territory, especially for soun... | |
| Bel Canto S300 driving Gallo 3.1s Marty,I put on some Sabbath, Zep and even some Kraftwerk yesterday...good solid FLAC files. I turned the volume all the way up on the Transporter and slowly went up to 92 on the attenuator of the BC Pre-3. It had very good sound and was loud, but ... | |
| Bel Canto S300 driving Gallo 3.1s Okay, with the front display reading 95 on a good FLAC (Breathe-Pink Floyd) it sounds very good and is loud...very loud. I am just thinking I shouldn't have to turn it up that far to get the sound...no overhead you see?My 100W Marshall guitar amp ... | |
| Bel Canto S300 driving Gallo 3.1s Marty, that is exactly my experience. I have the Transporter set at 100% volume and when the pre-amp comes up at 50, I can barely hear it. By the time the display hits 80, it counds pretty good, but not earth shattering at all. at 95 it sounds ver... | |
| Bel Canto S300 driving Gallo 3.1s I have tried reversing the polarity, but it didn't seem to make improvement at all. Maybe it is just an over expectation on my part, but I thought the Gallos would have bass that you can feel in your chest. I don't get to that until I am -15dbz of... |