von Schweikert VR-4 vs Vandersteen 5A


Highly placed audiophiles have told me that the Vandersteens lack "excitement" and that one should prefer the VR-4s. According to the recent article in TAS, the perception of lack of excitement could be the result of unfamiliarity with how a time coherent speaker sounds, i.e. the treble doesn't hit you first.

What do you think?
deangeli
I've recently spoken to the owner of Green Mountain Audio C-3's and he told me there isn't a speaker under $20K that can touch it. The list of speakers this guy has auditioned is impressive and if I'm not mistaken both the Von Schweikert VR-4 and Vandy 5A's were among those he was quite familiar with. If you like speakers with the transparent realism of stats and the dynamic qualities inherent in well designed coil driver designs that sound phenominal with ANY type of music whether it be jazz, classical, ambient, hard rock or any other category, the GMA C-3's apparently deliver in spades and at a price point that won't raise eyebrows with the wife.

PS - I have not heard the speakers myself, nor do I have any affiliation with GMA other than speakering to Roy Johnson a couple of times on the phone.
What a great country, that we are blessed with options for such wonderful fun and enjoyment. I too hear that the GMA's are great. Frankly from my vantage point, as one who loves music as much as anything, (next to my Family and the Creator) its good to see many of the new faces showing up in the industry pushing the envelope, and besting some of the older more established names that have ruled for so long.
God Bless, and Merry Christmas or simply Happy Holidays to everyone who bothers to read some of my drivel.
Larry R. Staples
"Excitement" may be the operative word here, as mentioned above that would indicate an artificial emphasis somewhere that creates the illusion of more/better when being compared in a store to a more neutral and correct sound. This can be easily perceived at first as lacking something but the rightness and accuracy of the sound establishes itself over time as being far preferrable. When you have had the chance to hear neutral products anything that isn't doesn't sound very good anymore, this goes for wire and components as well.

It's pretty hard to determine a "best", it's about finding a sound you like, just pay close attention to what was used for electronics and wire because you may not get the sound that captivated you in a showroom with an entirely different system.

In response to Dawgbyte's Green Mountain reference the Meadowlark Blue Heron 2's are in that category of "best" under $20k, they do well when compared to Eggleston Andras (the Diamonds) Von Schweikert's $14k model, and the Vandersteen 5A's. There are a lot of great speakers out there, and the electronics and wire will determine what you get out of them.

I have taken VR-4's in trade for Blue Heron 2's because I was able to illustrate the difference between perfect tonal balance and accuracy against something that isn't as well balanced. I wanted the chance to live with the upgraded VR-4s so that I could get a better feel for what they are doing over a period of time. They are enjoyable as soon as I give myself a week of running them to get used to them, but switching back to the Blue Herons was like coming home to the way it should be with no acclimation period. Somehow I don't trust anything you have to get used to, can you say BOSE?