2. digital
  3. 966809388

What deserves to be Remastered on CD?

Now I don't mean or want for this to become a digital vs. analogue discussion! I have a modest CD collection, around 300 titles, but all are the "best" recordings available. This being said, I have about a dozen or so CD's that haven't been remastered since I first bought them in the mid-80's! The difference between these early AD remasters and what's been produced in the last few years is astonishing! So lets hear it; what needs to be remastered in your CD collection? Some of my votes would include Peter, Paul & Mary, The Doors, The Who and many others! Too bad Mo-Fi isn't still around, they probably would have gotten to some these by now!
treyhoss
kira
83 posts
 
For starters, Bruce Springsteen and Neil Young catalogs
hungryear
62 posts
 
Supertramp, Fleetwood Mac
megasam's avatar
megasam
798 posts
 
Trey not all remasters are improvements on rock/alt CDs, many times they pump up the presence and give you a brighter CD that has diminished 3D and no air/bloom around instruments (and charge full list price!)......that said there are many great sucesses like Joni Mitchell "Court and Spark" HDCD which is great improvement. I find the Beatles remasters are sucessful, but the Rolling Stones albums from 60S ie: Hot Rocks is very dissappointing remaster, of course Beatles had Abbey Rd Studio masters to work from! I am sure the Bruce Springstein catalog will get remaster soon, although Darkness and River sound very good for main stream rock albums in current form. Fleetwood Mac CDs also sound good in current form from early 70's, I am afraid remaster will screw them up.........Tom Petty box set is remastered, I have original CDs ie: Torpedos, Waiting, would be interesting to compare sound.....they are getting better, but sometimes I prefer the original to the remaster.......classical remasters are usually very successful, probably because they have better original masters, and are sold to a more discriminating customer......Sam
More to discover