I think cognitive dissonance has been misinterpreted. it arises from a conflict between two perceptions. it is a defense mechanism.
it is a way of misrepresenting what you actually believe about an action, product or opinion.
here is an example. you buy a car, and someone tells you either the car is inferior , or you could have purchased the same car for a lower price. your response is a justification of your action to defend yourself from looking foolish in the eyes of another person.
cognitive dissonance entails making an excuse that might be socially acceptable, when you wish you had not taken the action in the first place.
I could think of an example in audio, when someone buys a solid state amplifier and the result is a degradation in the sound of his stereo system.
when someone points this out, a cognitive dissonance is created and some explanation is offered for the purchase, to justify it.
of course, with foresight, one can avoid such instances, or "mistakes", which are sometimes cited by another person, which often causes discomfort and results in a white lie.
it is a way of misrepresenting what you actually believe about an action, product or opinion.
here is an example. you buy a car, and someone tells you either the car is inferior , or you could have purchased the same car for a lower price. your response is a justification of your action to defend yourself from looking foolish in the eyes of another person.
cognitive dissonance entails making an excuse that might be socially acceptable, when you wish you had not taken the action in the first place.
I could think of an example in audio, when someone buys a solid state amplifier and the result is a degradation in the sound of his stereo system.
when someone points this out, a cognitive dissonance is created and some explanation is offered for the purchase, to justify it.
of course, with foresight, one can avoid such instances, or "mistakes", which are sometimes cited by another person, which often causes discomfort and results in a white lie.