A Suggestion Regarding Removal Of Posts


Three suggestions for providing greater transparency in why certain actions are taken. 

When a post is removed from a thread it now reads "Post Removed" followed by the date.  I suggest it should include who the poster was and the reason why the post was removed.

A thread could be terminated, but not removed.  The moderates should be able to stop any new posts from being added to a thread, but the thread should be available for viewing and archived.

Lastly, give the starter of a thread and only the starter the option of removing posts from that thread because they are "Off Topic".  The OP can help by stating right at the start what they consider "Off Topic".  The person who posted the "Off Topic" post can be given the option of staring a new thread.

Just a few thoughts with the intent of making Audiogon More Friendly Again!

128x128onhwy61

Recently a thread was deleted, because of which I don't recall the offending  member, but in which another popular member here contributed some lengthy well thoughtful and valueful (as usual) additions, with much time spent the doing. Some good posts are foresaken because of an ignoramus. Disclaimer: some of my friends are ignoramus' so this is not intended as any form of hate speech

There shouldb3 No censorship.

even when myself and others buy a ad I can’t even add a link, my telephone or email address why should we be censored whst is ths Twitter ,or Facebook ?

I recommend against that, because if it happens, @onhwy61 will lose his nose obviously first.

I still consider buy site to have freedom post. Instead when someone push delete post it delete that user.

Wife sister like me to buy site and set up dating component so lonely girl find nice pure audiophile with good ear.