2. amps-preamps
  3. 167738-11206

How has the NAD M2 (Class D) aged?

I remember when the NAD M2 came out around 10 years ago, I lusted after it but could never bring myself to pay full price for it.  I snagged one used recently and am in love with the sound.  The separation between notes is fantastic.  I remember years ago this amp was on Stereophiles "Class A" Recommended equipment too.

This leads me to ask: how has the NAD M2 aged?  How does it compare to newer Class D amplifiers?  Has anyone listened to this amplifier and compared it to other more recent Class D amps?
dorfma05
audiotroy's avatar
audiotroy
3,585 posts
 
We had one traded in a few years ago it was decent but not as good as our other amps
rh67
307 posts
 
The NAD M2 is not even in the same league as amps such as the AGD.
rolf_mueller_au
2 posts
 
I do have an M2 since 9 years, and just recently bought a CXN-V2, and am now totally surprise, how bad my other gear is. I went on a comparison spree this week, which made me think.
I have a Primare network player amplifier on a Dynaudio Contour S3.4, and realize now, that the Primare amplifiers are underpowered for the Dynaudio’s. With the CXN-V2, my NAD M2 on the Paradigms S7 sounds now better than the NAD M2 on the Dynaudio Contour S3.4.
I also compared the CXN-V2’s DAC via balanced output with the NAD’s DAC (optical and coaxial cable) and have to say, that the CXN-V2 is on the same level as the M2. The CXN-V2 is more forward in the sound stage, and certain details (like echoing Pavarotti’s voice in on the stage in Turandot) I was only able to hear that with the CXN-V2.
More to discover