You may even be inclined at that point to pull out your headphones.
I perhaps overestimated your knowledge a bit here...
Your last sentence is all i must know...
I dont doubt the superior possibilities of electronic tech in headphone....But it was not my point....
My point was a comparison between my Helmholtz grid against a processor in room acoustic control....
It is impossible for me to go back to any of my headphone now.... They are not on par with my room control...
It is easy to verify connecting any one of them:
3 dynamics, 2 Stax, one hybrid, 1 magneplanar..
They are all different, but not on par with my 2 positions of listening in my room...They have all of them their own good and bad points but they all lack natural timbre experience and livelier sound compared to my room.... ALL.... And any characterics they had more than my room before my acoustic control i had it now with my acoustic control in my room in a more natural way....
The fact that you say the opposite to me, and ask me to go back to headphones, reveal that you dont own a good room, or perhaps you own the best headphone there is and the costlier....
I will stay "ignorant" it seems... With my ears open tough....
I suggest learning about what the cross-talk issue is w.r.t. 2 channel audio and locating sounds and then you will understand why room acoustics cannot solve this.
If the recording engineer recorded the sounds of a cd or a files in some way with ANY three dimensional effects and directions, i listen already to them in my room.... then i dont look about locating sound better than i did alreadsy with my room controls.... Why doubting my results?
I think it is you who have no idea how i used my distribution of resonators in relation with my EARS and EACH speaker in an asymmetric way in my room ....
I know you know more than me in audio...
But knowing more is not knowing BETTER in all cases...
Meditate this....
I will read about what you just suggest anyway....
Thanks for your answer....