As someone who has been using wireless networks for decades, and bluetooth audio a great deal no. Just skip it and go with wired. Wireless is a toss up. For some it works for a long time, for some it has problems from day one. Wired is never ever like this.
Why not go wireless? (And how?)
With room correction getting more manageable, I am finally seriously contemplating a sub for two channel.
Some of the contenders, like Martin Logan and SVS, offer the possibility of wireless connection.
This seems very appealing in my space, although I remain a little suspicious.
The "run" would be about 15 ft.
To save everybody's time, I should say I am not a wire skeptic, and I think I can hear differences among cables. Nevertheless, my investment in that part of my system is comparatively modest, and my investment in cable to the sub would be still more so (the equivalent of bluejeans, or entry level signal cable).
So: is wireless now a reasonable option for my sub connection?
And: what considerations contribute to better implementation of wireless?
Thanks!
Some of the contenders, like Martin Logan and SVS, offer the possibility of wireless connection.
This seems very appealing in my space, although I remain a little suspicious.
The "run" would be about 15 ft.
To save everybody's time, I should say I am not a wire skeptic, and I think I can hear differences among cables. Nevertheless, my investment in that part of my system is comparatively modest, and my investment in cable to the sub would be still more so (the equivalent of bluejeans, or entry level signal cable).
So: is wireless now a reasonable option for my sub connection?
And: what considerations contribute to better implementation of wireless?
Thanks!
- ...
- 6 posts total
- 6 posts total