@djones51
This statement is flawed there is another possible conclusion well known to science that doesn’t require additional signals contained in the electrical signal. The other option? Bias, conduct a proper ABX test and see if people really confidently perceive this component of sound.
Of course, there is a bias, but let’s still assume that not all people who use special audio wires are biased. That sounds too far-fetched)
As for the tests - in order for them to be more or less indicative, in addition to the known requirements of psychophysics, it is necessary to take into account many additional factors:
1 - A person most confidently perceives the difference in the sound of wires only on his home system, the features of the sound of which he knows thoroughly. Тhis works as a Baxandall subtraction method. On an unfamiliar system, most often a person is lost, he needs some time to understand all aspects of the sound of the music of this system and still it will not be as accurate as during usual home tests.
2 - Not all systems with the same technical characteristics are able to clearly convey the difference in the reverse polarity of the wire.
3 - Of those who have not previously encountered the assessment of anomalous phenomena in audio, not all are able to immediately catch the difference, even if it is obvious to those who are pro in the topic. That is, the perception of subtle things must be brought up and nurtured, this process takes some time, sometimes years.
4 - The difference in sound is most obvious on old analog recordings - classical music and jazz, the subtleties of which are understood only by a small percentage of music lovers.
5 - On a revealing, structurally simple audio system, the wire may sound different even in the same longitudinal direction if certain rules are not followed.
The list can be continued, but I think it is not for anything. In this situation, it is almost impossible to organize tests so that they simultaneously meet the existing subjective data and strict scientific requirements. Are there any other ideas besides bias?