Visual Confirmation Bias


Nice term, Paul. Very impressive. Very scientific.

And original. Well, at least I’ve never seen it before so I’m going to claim it as my own.

Visual Confirmation Bias (VCB) is a variation on confirmation bias that postulates that your brain causes audio gear, particularly speakers, to sound the way they look.

I came up with this idea a week ago when I got my new (used) KEF LS50s. (Note: I’m sure that dozens of people have been talking about VCB for a hundred years. I’m not particularly interested in who preceded me but raising points like that is one of the reasons that this forum exists.)


I had read lots about the speaker and I was expecting accuracy and soundstage precision. Their rich, full sound surprised me. These were not adjectives that were usually attached to these speakers.

I’ve been obsessed with these speakers for the past week, reading about them constantly. I find myself most in agreement with The Absolute Sound, which described the speakers—just after they were released—as possessing a “prevailing sweetness, a harmonic saturation that lends it a dark, velvety overall character, and a bloom that is so pleasing that I began affectionately dubbing it the butterscotch sundae of small monitors.”


But in the years that followed, listener after listener reported a “hard” “bright” sound. And when I look at the speaker, those words make complete sense. A tiny metallic driver in a small box? They look tinny and bright so no wonder some people hear that.

My own strongest experience with VCB: Many years ago, on the pretense of looking for a CD player, I walked into Sound By Singer at its old 16th St. location. After just enough feigned interest, I asked the salesman to listen to something “really pornographic.”

Surprisingly, he was happy to take me into one of the listening rooms. The only specific piece of equipment I remember was a pair of Wilson Speakers. I don’t know which model but they were white and just over six feet tall. Each the size of a restaurant-grade refrigerator. They were somewhere in the neighborhood of $250,000.

Then I settled into the listening chair as the salesman started turning stuff on. Preamp, monoblock, monoblock, God knows what else. I just remember him throwing switch after switch. I have to believe all that gear equaled the price of the speakers.

If ever a system should have disappeared, it was this one. If ever the music should have been revealed to me, it was now. But even with my eyes closed, all I could see—and all I could hear—were these huge speakers looming over me. They could not have been more present in my listening experience.

Visual confirmation bias kept me from enjoying the finest pair of speakers that I’ll probably ever hear. The phenomenon is not to be underestimated.
paul6001
Nobody in his right mind can except himself from biases...

The problem is when some people with BLINDERS use biases to explain ALL incremental continuous changes in a set of experiment in acoustic control for example or with the many modifications possible about the audio gear...

Think a little more than few seconds please....Before insulting....
Our aural memory isn't that good for anything but seconds or do we deny that as well. 
Our aural memory isn’t that good for anything but seconds or do we deny that as well.
It is only your blinders that make you to think and affirm that others deny anything about biases or aural memory... Precision about something and adding context is NOT a denegation of something true, save for limited opinionated spirits...


Aural memory has 2 level:

Sound :very short memory, melody for example: very long memory..

In language we forget the sound of the speech shortly NOT the meaning....

In listening music i remember my impression of the sound in my body/brain, it is an emotion associated with the sounds, not the sounds themselves...


Think few seconds before insulting....
We're not talking about remembering melodies but frequencies why don't you try thinking and remove your blinders. 
We’re not talking about remembering melodies but frequencies
When we judge an audio system qualities, we listen to the instrument playing musical timbre, where melody and harmony one note after the other are the perceived phenomenon....

Timbre perception is not the perception of a passive external sound, it is the dynamical perception/interpretation of a concrete sound in a room, with a continous change of the fundamental frequencies and the spectral envelope...

This perceiving experience is associated with an emotion in the body and this is this emotion which we remember not the concrete sound in itself...


By the way we human listen NOT to abstract frequencies... We listen to TIMBRE.... You misjudged audio experience....You trust to much electronic design reading publicity.... Humans listen to TIMBRE, not  pure frequencies in an anechoic chamber...Ears are not simplistic measuring electronic devices...