Though if I left the impression of needing any more than the 6 MM/I cartridges I already own, this was not intended. Sorry.
@justmetoo
Itâs OK, after my first high-end LOMC I was pretty sure that it is the last cartridge, but then I bought 60 more somehow over the years, because of the curiosity.
According to Russian psychology (at least) as I now learned, goose-bumps an be caused by most anything, even a good motion? đ
Never mind an experience of well presented analogue music.
Some people even crying when the music is good, they donât need a cartridge for that, emotional contact with the music can be settled even if youâre playing a song from iPhone.
Playing music from vinyl records for the people for over 20 years Iâve seen a lot, been traveling worldwide with my records. For majority of people Music is the key, not a cartridge, not even a sound system!
Neither the best resolution CD or MC will give me goose-bumps.
Changing to e.g. my AT 440ML will do, will emotionaly move me, has emotional *impact* with every note played. CD and even MC seems to resonate with my intellect, my MMs with my emotions.
It seems somehow contradictory, but so it is.
Anyone else has these experiences?
Audiophiles are strange.
Sitting alone in front of the speakers we have to hear what was recorded mixed and mastered by professionals in the studio. In other words we have to hear the truth. If it was analog master then it must be Reel to Reel or Vinyl, and this is where digital doesnât work.
This is what you have to read to understand why an MM (youâre not alone with your impression):
* Interesting point of view from TAS magazine (back issue) article called "Assessing the State-of-the-Art in Storage Media" (Issue 40). In this, J. T. Henderson reports on a listening session comparing digital master tape, analogue master tape, direct-to-disc lacquer and the "live" mike feed; the report consists of a long conversation among J. Boyk, Keith Johnson, Doug Sax, and JTH himself.
Those people were top sound engineers if you donât know:
"On the one hand, we have assurances of the leaders of the High End recording industry that the best Moving Magnets are very close to the Master Tape and that they are capable of "uncanny" resolution. On the other hand, we have the prevailing perception, amounting almost to a shibboleth, of the High End listening community, that only Moving Coils are realistic in some sense of that word and that Moving Magnets are incapable of sonic truth. While it is clearly beyond the scope of a single review to resolve this conflict entirely, a couple of points come to mind. In direct comparison of two "sounds", tonal balance differences show up very conspicuously. Good Moving Magnets can be very nearly neutral tonally, as well as being low in the kinds of distortion that are audibly significant. Moving Coils are low in distortion, too, but typically they are quite far from neutral tonally, with a "presence range" suck-out followed by a high frequency rise."
Their choice of monitoring cartridge during the disk mastering process was Stanton 881s mkII, Audio-Technica AT-ML170 and Technics P100c mk4. All cartridges are Moving Magnet type.
BUT not every MM cartridge of today can give you what Stanton, Audio-Technica, Technics ... top models can do!
P.S. I can imagine how many great TAS articles about classic MM or MC cartridges I have missed, they are not available online sadly.Â