My Long List of Amplifiers and My Personal Review of Each!


So I have been in a long journey looking to find the best amplifiers for my martin logan montis. As you know, the match between an amplifier and speakers has to be a good "marriage" and needs to be blend exquisitely. Right now, I think I might have found the best sounding amplifier for martin logan. I have gone through approximately 34-36 amplifiers in the past 12 months. Some of these are:

Bryston ST, SST, SST2 series
NAD M25
PARASOUND HALO
PARASOUND CLASSIC
KRELL TAS
KRELL KAV 500
KRELL CHORUS
ROTEL RMB 1095
CLASSE CT 5300
CLASSE CA 2200
CLASSE CA 5200
MCINTOSH MC 205
CARY AUDIO CINEMA 7
OUTLAW AUDIO 755
LEXICON RX7
PASS LABS XA 30.8
BUTLER AUDIO 5150
ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005

With all that said, the amplifiers I mentioned above are the ones that in my opinion are worth mentioning. To make a long story short, there is NO 5 CHANNEL POWER AMP that sounds as good as a 3ch and 2ch amplifier combination. i have done both experiments and the truth is that YOU DO lose details and more channel separation,etc when you select a 5 channel power amplifier of any manufacturer.
My recollection of what each amp sounded like is as follows:

ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005 (great power and amazing soundstage. Very low noise floor, BUT this amplifiers NEEDS TO BE cranked up in order to fully enjoy it. If you like listening at low volume levels or somewhat moderate, you are wasting your time here. This amp won’t sound any different than many other brands out there at this volume. The bass is great, good highs although they are a bit bright for my taste)

NAD M25 (very smooth, powerful, but somewhat thin sounding as far as bass goes)
Bryston sst2(detailed, good soundstage, good power, but can be a little forward with certain speakers which could make them ear fatiguing at loud volumes)

Krell (fast sounding, nice bass attack, nice highs, but some detail does get lost with certain speakers)

rotel (good amp for the money, but too bright in my opinion)

cary audio (good sound overall, very musical, but it didn’t have enough oomph)

parasound halo (good detail, great bass, but it still holds back some background detail that i can hear in others)

lexicon (very laid back and smooth. huge power, but if you like more detail or crisper highs, this amp will disappoint you)

McIntosh mc205 (probably the worst multichannel amp given its price point. it was too thin sounding, had detail but lacked bass.

butler audio (good amplifier. very warm and smooth sweet sounding. i think for the money, this is a better amp than the parasound a51)

pass labs (very VERY musical with excellent bass control. You can listen to this for hours and hours without getting ear fatigue. however, it DOES NOT do well in home theater applications if all you have is a 2 channel set up for movies. The midrange gets somewhat "muddy" or very weak sounding that you find yourself trying to turn it up.

classe audio (best amplifier for multi channel applications. i simply COULDNT FIND a better multi channel amplifier PERIOD. IT has amazing smoothness, amazing power and good bass control although i would say krell has much better bass control)

Update: The reviews above were done in January 2015. Below is my newest update as of October 2016:



PS AUDIO BHK 300 MONOBLOCKS: Amazing amps. Tons of detail and really amazing midrange. the bass is amazing too, but the one thing i will say is that those of you with speakers efficiency of 87db and below you will not have all the "loudness" that you may want from time to time. These amps go into protection mode when using a speaker such as the Salon, but only at very loud levels. Maybe 97db and above. If you don’t listen to extreme crazy levels, these amps will please you in every way.

Plinius Odeon 7 channel amp: This is THE BEST multichannel amp i have ever owned. Far , but FAR SUPERIOR to any other multichannel amp i have owned. In my opinion it destroyed all of the multichannel amps i mentioned above and below. The Odeon is an amp that is in a different tier group and it is in a league of its own. Amazing bass, treble and it made my center channel sound more articulate than ever before. The voices where never scrambled with the action scenes. It just separated everything very nicely.

Theta Dreadnaught D: Good detailed amp. Looks very elegant, has a pleasant sound, but i found it a tad too bright for my taste. I thought it was also somewhat "thin" sounding lacking body to the music. could be that it is because it is class d?

Krell Duo 300: Good amp. Nice and detailed with enough power to handle most speakers out there. I found that it does have a very nice "3d" sound through my electrostatics. Nothing to fault here on this amp.
Mark Levinson 532H: Great 2 channel amp. Lots of detail, amazing midrange which is what Mark Levinson is known for. It sounds very holographic and will please those of you looking for more detail and a better midrange. As far as bass, it is there, but it is not going to give you the slam of a pass labs 350.5 or JC1s for example. It is great for those that appreciate classical music, instrumental, etc, but not those of you who love tons of deep bass.

 It is articulate sounding too
Krell 7200: Plenty of detail and enough power for most people. i found that my rear speakers contained more information after installed this amp. One thing that i hated is that you must use xlr cables with this amp or else you lose most of its sound performance when using RCA’s.

Krell 402e: Great amp. Very powerful and will handle any speaker you wish. Power is incredible and with great detail. That said, i didn’t get all the bass that most reviewers mentioned. I thought it was "ok" in regards to bass. It was there, but it didn’t slam me to my listening chair.

Bryston 4B3: Good amp with a complete sound. I think this amp is more laid back than the SST2 version. I think those of you who found the SST2 version of this amp a little too forward with your speakers will definitely benefit from this amp’s warmth. Bryston has gone towards the "warm" side in my opinion with their new SST3 series. As always, they are built like tanks. I wouldn’t call this amp tube-like, but rather closer to what the classe audio delta 2 series sound like which is on the warm side of things.

Parasound JC1s: Good powerful amps. Amazing low end punch (far superior bass than the 402e). This amp is the amp that i consider complete from top to bottom in regards to sound. Nothing is lacking other than perhaps a nicer chassis. Parasound needs to rework their external appearance when they introduce new amps. This amp would sell much more if it had a revised external appearance because the sound is a great bang for the money. It made my 800 Nautilus scream and slam. Again, amazing low end punch.

Simaudio W7: Good detailed amp. This amp reminds me a lot of the Mark Levinson 532h. Great detail and very articulate. I think this amp will go well with bookshelves that are ported in order to compensate for what it lacks when it comes to the bass. That doesn’t mean it has no bass, but when it is no Parasound JC1 either.
Pass labs 350.5: Wow, where do i begin? maybe my first time around with the xa30.8 wasn’t as special as it was with this monster 350.5. It is just SPECTACULAR sounding with my electrostatics. The bass was THE BEST BASS i have ever heard from ANY amp period. The only amp that comes close would be the jC1s. It made me check my settings to make sure the bass was not boosted and kept making my jaw drop each time i heard it. It totally destroyed the krell 402e in every regard. The krell sounded too "flat" when compared to this amp. This amp had amazing mirange with great detail up top. In my opinion, this amp is the best bang for the money. i loved this amp so much that i ended up buying the amp that follows below.

Pass labs 250.8: What can i say here. This is THE BEST STEREO AMP i have ever heard. This amp destroys all the amps i have listed above today to include the pass labs 350.5. It is a refined 350.5 amp. It has more 3d sound which is something the 350.5 lacked. It has a level of detail that i really have never experienced before and the bass was amazing as well. I really thought it was the most complete power amplifier i have ever heard HANDS DOWN. To me, this is a benchmark of an amplifier. This is the amp that others should be judged by. NOTHING is lacking and right now it is the #1 amplifier that i have ever owned.

My current amps are Mcintosh MC601s: i decided to give these 601s a try and they don’t disappoint. They have great detail, HUGE soundstage, MASSIVE power and great midrange/highs. The bass is great, but it is no pass labs 250.8 or 350.5. As far as looks, these are the best looking amps i have ever owned. No contest there. i gotta be honest with you all, i never bought mcintosh monos before because i wasn’t really "wowed" by the mc452, but it could have been also because at that time i was using a processor as a preamp which i no longer do. Today, i own the Mcintosh C1100 2 chassis tube preamp which sounds unbelievable. All the amps i just described above have been amps that i auditioned with the C1100 as a preamp. The MC601s sound great without a doubt, but i will say that if you are looking for THE BEST sound for the money, these would not be it. However, Mcintosh remains UNMATCHED when it comes to looks and also resale value. Every other amp above depreciates much faster than Mcintosh.

That said, my future purchase (when i can find a steal of a deal) will be the Pass labs 350.8. I am tempted to make a preliminary statement which is that i feel this amp could be THE BEST stereo amp under 30k dollars. Again, i will be able to say more and confirm once i own it. I hope this update can help you all in your buying decisions!


128x128jays_audio_lab
Instead of using nebulous concepts of synergy, it is more productive to objectively describe what you hear, like neutrality, clarity, focus, warmth, etc.  I distinctly remember in one of Jay's videos where he said that the Boulder preamp is more musical with rounding of edges, compared to the Pandora preamp.  It is probably not in print on this thread.  Golfnutz just described how he perceived the Boulder as more relaxed than Gryphon.  This differs from the perceptions of myself, mrdecibel and others here as well as on the YT videos.  All this put together shows how it may be an apples/oranges contest, and I must admit that I didn't hear a BIG difference.  So I still speculate that on the spectrum of neutrality/clarity/focus on one end at 10, and warmth/relaxed on the other end at 1, Pandora preamp + Boulder amp is 10, Boulder + Boulder is 9, Pandora + Mephisto is 8, Boulder + Mephisto is 7.

Let's defer to Jay to state what he actually said about Pandora vs Boulder preamps, and then do the listening to the 4 combos I proposed. This is a lot of work, I admit, and mainly of value for Jay who will be making decisions about what he keeps and sells.  If he wants to do videos on this, that would be great, but only if he wants our input on this expensive decision making.  This will be a tough decision, because Jay and most of us thought that he would never give up the Mephisto, since he went to all the trouble of getting expensive stands and many types of cables to try with the Mephisto.

Cables are a factor, but much more subtle than the differences between preamps and amps.  Cables are unlikely to alter his decision between Boulder and Gryphon preamps and amps.
FYI – I am using the same Shure MV8+ microphone as Jay.
I didn’t want to post a 19 minute video to compare the songs that Jay had posted so I am splitting them up.
Sorry for the inconvenience.

https://youtu.be/ze4Enfzt9CE


Full disclosure--I am friendly with faxer (Steve) who just posted this video of the latest GTA panel speaker with the open baffle subwoofers.  This is the same song from the last Jay video of the Alexx with Boulder from the start.  Easy to go back and forth.  Steve just got the same microphone that Jay is using.  I heard this setup at his place on Dec 23.  I haven't spoken with him since that visit, and I assume he is using that new microphone with his phone, just like Jay.

Here is what I hear.  The GTA is much crisper than the Alexx on the voice and guitar.  It is drier, which I think is more true to life.  The voice on the GTA is more immediate and throaty, whereas on the Alexx it is more chesty, veiled, warmed and smoothed over.  And this GTA is with the euphonic Lampi dac and Pass preamp and amp.  Imagine the even more startling clarity with Jay's Boulder or Gryphon electronics, and the ultra transparent clear DCS Rossini.  I predict that many people here will prefer the warmer, darker Alexx sound, but let's see what everyone thinks.

This latest revision of the GTA is FAR superior to any Maggie ever made, for reasons that Steve can explain better than me.  One added attraction is that the sweet spot is quite large, so 3 people can sit together comfortably on Steve's couch and hear very similar sound.  The sound is slightly clearer in the exact middle.  When I visited, I toed the panels in fully, so that the midpoint of the panels were aimed at my ears.  The main driver on the panel is 8" wide, but the actual membrane is only about 5.5" wide.  A narrower straight panel is the ideal for full freq radiation.  I praise Greg, the designer for the best implementation of the theoretical principles I have talked about, and my objections to other large and curved panels on the market is now clearly revealed.  Greg, like me, owned several Maggies over the years, and he wanted to improve on them.  I congratulate him for his accomplishments.

I am returning Dec 30 with my Rane EQ, Bryston 2.5B SST2, zip cord speaker wires, LiveWire RCA interconnects.  With Steve's permission, I hope to make a video of all this, with different settings of my EQ to illustrate what I have been talking about.  
Viber,
If you are raving about Steve’s speaker the way you are, why would you use a lousy 100 dollar rane eq on them? No offense but is your hearing so damaged due to playing violins? I would love to see the settings on the rane eq that you use. Can Steve post a pic of the rane settings you are using? I am curious to know if you are boosting the hell out of the high frequencies which is why you use a rane eq.

Who pollutes a speaker that is said to be as clear as water by using a rane eq?
Also, when are you cutting the check for the gt audio speakers? I mean, with all the leg work Steve is doing to accommodate your entire set up i would image you are definitely going to buy their speakers... It would be the only way that your comments would hold any weight here...
If i heard those speakers in my room and was blown away the way you are and there was no doubt that i am head over heels with them, I’d be telling Steve that the check is in the mail as is the case with many reviewers.
When something leaves an impression on me that I can’t get it out of my head, i move whatever it takes in order to make it mine.
I really hope you do give Steve the business he deserves from you.
If you feel that deep down they are not the speaker for you then I’d stop talking about them if i were you. It makes it worse the more you praise them and they are still not in your possession.
I really hope he's not wasting his time with you. 

This leads me to share with you one of my future videos. It will be about WHAT DOES A DEALER need to do in order to earn your business? ( I will itemize these things) and i will also  call out the bs that many "Audiophiles" pull with dealers. Many dealers asked me to speak up and i agreed with them as long as I can also call them out on their practices and they said "fair enough". 
I suspect this video will be one big controversial video since this topic never really comes up on YouTube.