Sonus Faber sonetto II vs Harbeth 7ES-3

I had the Harbeths for almost 3 years and upgraded within the Harbeth line.
The C7ES3 are exquisite speakers- rich with an excellent midrange and eerily smooth with an overall forgiveness that makes everything sound great.   Imaging, sound stage and coherence are top of the class.   
A value for the money IMHO.  
I have heard some SF speakers and do not care for their voicing.  They are somewhat recessed in the midrange and a slight excess of high treble.
The measurements in this link seem to predict the same.  
If you prefer midrange clarity and realism, especially vocals & horns, the Harbeths in a split second.  

https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/sonus-faber-sonetto-ii-measurements-now-with-a-spinorama.10727/

I've had the C7ES3 and @avanti1960 's description is exactly right. I also upgraded within the Harbeth line and gave the C7's to my son. He loves the them and I still get to enjoy them when I visit.

Thank you for your response. The excessive treble doesn't bother me as i'm used to it (currently owning q acoustics 3050i).
I'm somehow leaning more towards SFs because thy look superb and have more relaxed sound. But, the decision is not made yet :) looking forward for your opinions guys! 

harbeth over sonus faber any day of the week

unless you are a classical only music lover, even then harbeths are at least equal to sf's