Does Anyone Currently Make an Ethernet to I2S Renderer?

Wow, interesting comments there from Mojo. And that was a private email to you, cal?

Makes sense I2S was never intended to be used between boxes just short runs between chips. 

RE: Cal3713 ,..That is quite the response you got from Benjamin Zwickel ,

Sure what would the average consumer know however if i2s is so unworthy used as a chassis to chassis connection why would these component designers use it and promote i2s if it has such a negative result on a their component’s overall performance ?  that I don’t get.
Reading Mr. Zwickel response to your question Cal3713 really set him off to call his competition names like that .

I no longer use i2s not because I felt there was something wrong about it , the change over to using USB came only after a dealer then a home demonstration of a new digital front end and if I were to change my current dac MOJO would be one of the few I would consider..

 

@jriggy Yes, it was in a private email. Hopefully it is ok that I shared the thoughts.  Can't say I liked the tone, but it's also a very valid and relevant opinion. I'd love to hear one of his dacs. The chips, ancillary parts, and power supplies are clearly very well thought out. I suspect they sound wonderful.

And he was right in my application. Eliminating i2s and going to spdif (with an old inferior monster cable) improved the sound. 

And @djones51 I did read somewhere (maybe on ps audio's forums?), that you just need to increase the voltage of the i2s signal to push it further than the recommended 4" in the standard. No idea if this is true or not.