Articles You Feel Should be Shared


I’ll kick off with a recent posting by the remarkably clear-sighted and even handed Archimago.

Once again cutting through layers of mostly deliberate confusion, obfuscation and denial.

Production, Reproduction and Perception - the 3 pillars upon which everything in our audiophile world stands, is my new mantra.

So simple it’s surprising that no one else pointed it out earlier.

Be sure to also check out his follow up blog from Wednesday, 11 March 2020.

http://archimago.blogspot.com/2020/03/musings-audio-music-audiophile-big.html?m=1
cd318
You find interesting articles. I used to be enamored with the bling for lack of a better word of high priced gear and always swore it sounded better. I started questioning this notion with the onset of crazy priced cables. Another thing was unbeknownst to her my wife made me question my notions as well when she would say I'm sorry I have no idea what you did but it sounds the same to me. It's hard get people to question long held beliefs and I'm not sure very many on this site will but I enjoy your thread, keep em coming. 
djones51,

Listener Preferences and Perception of Digital versus Analog Live Concert Recordings 

John M. Geringer and Patrick Dunnigan


https://www.jstor.org/stable/40319018


Excellent research article from 2000 of the kind that the audiophile press never seem to find time to even mention.
For that reason alone articles of this kind are worth more than decades unfocused conjecture.

As I was reading through I was becoming increasingly curious as to what the results would be. Which version of the live event would the students prefer?

There will always be inevitable questions regarding the methodology employed in recording but the results seem fairly conclusive enough to me.

Plenty more of interest here. Here's just one of many preliminary observations.


"In an often cited study, Kirk (1956)
demonstrated that despite differences in technical signal quality, listeners
preferred the sound systems they had listened to consistently. Kirk concluded
that learning played an important role in determining preference for sound
reproduction systems and that continued contact with a particular system produces shifts in perception towards that system."


What does this suggest about our preferences, and what they're based upon? 
I found the study on a link from this article. 

https://www.vox.com/2014/4/19/5626058/vinyls-great-but-its-not-better-than-cds

What does this suggest about our preferences, and what they're based upon?

Good question, I know my preference was vinyl and tape but at the time those were the choices. When CDs came around they didn't sound right but I had no idea why. As technology caught up and the more I listened to digital I got a sense of why, with digital I was hearing more which might have explained why vinyl sounded warm and more "relaxing" ? It was what I was used to. Now after years of exposure to digital I find I prefer the accuracy,   it sounds more real to me. Maybe like a marriage of 30 years it boils down to familiarity. 
Excellent article on room treatment by a multi-award-winning studio designer:

https://www.gikacoustics.com/diffusion-by-jeff-hedback/   

Some very advanced concepts about loudspeaker design and relevant psychoacoustics:

http://www.gedlee.com/Papers/Philosophy.pdf   

Excellent article on the home audio implications of concert hall acoustics, written by a concert violinist and author of the previously mentioned article on the late great Siegfried Linkwitz:

http://www.regonaudio.com/Records%20and%20Reality.html  

Duke