2. home-theater
  3. 157312-5445

Pioneer LX500 BD player vs. Arcam BD players

Though a Sony OLED will likely be my next TV, unless quasi-free services like Kanopy, via my public library, are 4K, the rest of my source material will largely be from my own DVD and 1080p BD collection. I love the overall quality and features of my Oppo 95 but unlike my JVC XV-NA70BK DVD player the Oppo's zoom control does not let you “center” the zoomed image on the screen. I want a second BD player anyway and the manuals of the Pioneer LX500 and at least one of the Arcam models at least imply that they have this specific extra zoom functionality-though thanks to the BD Assn’s Oracle BD-J authoring platform some BD movies disable the player’s zoom and/or slow motion features.

LOL, but more of us than you may think detest the CE industry’s omission of BD player zoom controls. We are okay with losing resolution due to their occasional but hardly use as tools for eliminating bars, as aptly explained here, for example. https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread.php?s=7d39a92a06401e05818cb2a05905128f&p=17680370#post17680370

As my luck has it none of the stellar performing Oppos have this advanced zoom control; some like the Panasonic, Sony and McIntosh BD players have no zoom control at all. Ditto for any models from Marantz, and who like Arcam, Sim Audio and numerous other high end brands have phased out BD players from their lines.

And there’s talk among LX500 owners that pandemic or not Pioneer may not resume production of this or other players due to market perceptions and/or relations with their Onkyo parent or their marketing partner. https://www.soundunited.com/

As the LX500 and the Arcams likely all have Source Direct, my Sony OLED will handle the DVD and 1080p BD upscaling duties. But would anyone know how the LX500’s other video and audio performance aspects compare to any or all of the Arcam models?

I rarely use hardware players for music. But how might stereo DAC SQ via the RCA outputs from DVD and BD movies from the latest Arcam models compare to the LX500?

And please confirm that the Arcam BD model you have can zoom at least 2x or more, AND that it lets you then center any part of the zoomed image you want on the screen.

Does the Arcam’s slow motion have at least 4 steps and frame by frame control?

Does your Arcam remote let you adjust the volume and mute of the analog RCA outputs when fed to a non-Arcam amplifier or AVR?

Last but hardly least, how old is your Arcam BD player and do you know how much longer Arcam intends to stock critical replacement parts?


ajant
ajant OP
62 posts
 

Thanks for the warning about Arcam BD players, though these reviews generally give it high marks for both video and audio performance. https://www.trustedreviews.com/reviews/arcam-udp411

https://www.trustedreviews.com/reviews/arcam-udp411

The UDP411’s lack of DVD-A support is no biggie, as I have no SACDs or DVD-A discs And if I did (e.g. Beach Boys’ “Pet Sounds”) I’d play them via JRiver and feed the audio via USB to a multi DAC like Exasound’s e38. I’d do the same for BD and DVDs movies with kickass music in DTS MA. JRiver decodes it and outputs the video via HDMI to my screen. In addition to slow motion JRiver gives you advanced zoom control over any decrypted BD. JRiver is fully remote controllable via several kinds of “learning” modules, like this one. http://www.usbuirt.com/ 

But I still want a high end standalone BD player with excellent analog stereo sound for movies. Depending on your ears the Arcam may provide a smoother sound than the Oppo 105, say one of these reviews. How its video and audio performance may compare to the Pioneer LX500 is another matter. I could probably find this over priced player selling for half that and brand new But Arcam discontinued their BD player line and buying a five year old player puts it closer to when critical replacement parts are no more. Had Arcam committed themselves to offering long term factory service like Oppo has I might have jumped on the 411. So it’s got to be the LX500.

Well, that decision wasn’t too hard. Thanks for chiming in.  

 


mahler123
3,027 posts
 
Have you looked at the Sony Universal players?  They aren’t built like a tank but get good reviews and are cheaper thanthePioneer
ajant OP
62 posts
 

 Yes, I’ve scoured the manual pdfs of every top Sony and Panasonic 4K player, including the very unaffordable McIntosh.At least according to the manuals, I think some have slow motion, but I’m sure none of them have even the basic zoom that my Oppo 95 has, much less the advanced zoom control in my JVC XV-NA70BK DVD player, at ~ 1/8 the price of my Oppo. Again, zoom and even slo mo are some of the ways cineasts get close to the action and settings of the movies and TV shows we enjoy, albeit at some loss or resolution. But it certainly isn’t for removing black bars, as doing that crops off content.

Why Sony and Panasonic don’t get this is beyond me, since these features were standard on virtually all DVD players. That the BD Assn locks those slo mo and/or zoom out on BDs is hardly an excuse for omitting them from a player’s feature set. And we can still enjoy using them with our DVD collections, or the few BDs that aren’t disabled by BD-J. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BD-J#BD-J_Xlet_capabilities

So it’s the Pioneer LX500 for me.

 


twoleftears's avatar
twoleftears
5,313 posts
 
Have you found one in stock somewhere?
mahler123
3,027 posts
 
I was listening to a DVD-A on the Pioneer today.  I know this disc well Maurice Abravanel and the Utah SO in Tchaikovsky Swan Lake.  I had played this many times in the same system with a Pioneer Elite 20 year old universal Player.  With the LX 500 I was greatly aware of the Hall ambience.  Previously there were spots where I thought that the Conductor was taking long pauses, but with the new player one could hear echoing in the hall from loud passages, and that Abravanel was waiting for the echoing to dissipate.  Front to back Orchestral layout was much better delineated.
More to discover