Why no interest in reel to reel if you're looking for the ultimate sound?
People refer to a recording as having "master tape quality", well you can actually hear that master tape sound through your own system and the point of entry to reel to reel is so much more affordable than getting into vinyl. Thoughts?
- ...
- 215 posts total
The late Roger Modjeski was very fond of Revox tape decks and has several A77s, most not working that were intended for parts or possible refurbishment. However, he does have a working unit which has 15ips speed (original, not modified). Here is an interesting tidbit from Roger about R2R decks and A77s in particular:
|
I kind of foolishly fancied that Abbey Road would have used something like a top quality Studer (certainly in the back half of the 60s) but no. Apparently they used a British design instead - the BTR3 (British Tape Recorder 3) to record most of their seminal albums. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Tape_Recorder I also recall a quaint story I heard about when Sinatra came to record in London in the early 60s (I think it must have been the 1962 Sinatra Sings Great Songs From Great Britain/ CTS Studios). Legend has it that he was so unimpressed with the technology available that he had an Ampex tape deck and operator specially flown over for the occasion! Perhaps some fan of Ol Blue Eyes can fill in the details. In any case these mastertapes are still the best source of this priceless music that we have. To have a first or even second generation copy of a favourite album... |
- 215 posts total