LP made from a digital master recording...

The analog from a digital recording will often contain the full data from that recording (apart from RIAA compression, but we all know that), whereas you might end up with a more compressed version of the digital file, thus losing information. That’s not quite what the OP asked but an important concern. If you can get the digital at full resolution and have equally resolving equipment (how could you objectively determine that?), there is no difference—at least the handful of times a dealer has demo’d that for me, my ears couldn’t hear a difference. 
Here’s a problem still—I have no desire to purchase high-resolution files and then store them at home. That means that I am limited to Tidal or Qobuz. I believe that there’s sometimes distortion or lossiness in the streaming process/modem issues, bandwidth, etc, so that the same digital streamed file will sound different at different times, even if it is occurring at the purportedly same bit rate. 

1979. Rise. Herb Alpert. 

The first track is analog mastered. All the remaining tracks were digitally recorded on 3M’s new 32 bit mastering system. 

I have the original vinyl pressing. 10 years later, in 1989, I bought the CD.

The LP is far superior than the 16 bit CD.

Ive seen this over and over again, back during the time when vinyl was mastered, cut, and pressed properly, that the vinyl produces a superior experience over digital. Digital is easy, no work. Vinyl is an art form.

Another example: Linda Ronstadt’s 3 albums she recorded with the Nelson Riddle Orchestra in the 1980s. All 3 vinyl LPs sound far superior to the CD versions. Also, her 1989 album with Aaron Nevill; the LP is far superior to the CD version. All digitally recorded. Artisans mastered the vinyl, flunkies mastered the CDs.

How about we fast forward past 1985 ?

see for example the recent Macy Gray and Amber Reubarth....

I have the Firebird Suite LP with Robert Shaw and the ASO recorded in 1978 from Telarc Records that was recorded in digital tape and released in analog. Years later in the 80's I got the CD, very excited I thought that being an original digital recording,  will sound better than the LP. Still today it sounds better than the CD. It's not only me, others that listen to my system agree with me

I have the old Eagles LP "Hell Freezes Over" - cost me over £200 but great. As a matter if interest is the new LP release (remastered) from a digital base or the old base (and what was that?) and thus some difference should be able to be identified due to the great qualities of the recording in the first place. I am tempted to buy the new 180g LP as it is almost a reasonable price