Curious about the difference in what I’d hear on different tonearms

I'm still reeling over the Adam Schiff comment.  Who needs that here?

That’s why I don’t ask mAny questions. I try & make questions very specific & usually ask for no extraneous personal stuff. And, I always get those comments & people pontificating about my question & then recommending a $10k option they love instead. Out of 20 responses, I’ll get 4 that contain the info I asked for.  I do have to say that particular comment was helpful & I didn’t take it a really mean spirited.  It seemed like a throw away funny comment.  And. Usually, they’ll go on for a paragraph or 2. But, this is still the best place to get info.

@bdp24 Got it. I'm betraying my age!

@tochsii See my post above for note on what to expect with better arm.

Thank you, for helping me understand this better.  I appreciated your comments.

Your specific question was really very narrow. You really needed responses only from persons who have owned and used the rega 303, 808, and 2000 tonearms, if I understand your post correctly. Which is why I did not respond, except to Mijo on his political comment. I actually wonder whether anyone here has had personal experience with even 2 out of 3 of those particular Rega tonearms.  I do have one opinion that you might find useful. I partially disagree with Miller carbon. The interaction between the headshell  and the cartridge is also very important in determining the ultimate sound quality. Certain headshell materials seem to work better with certain cartridges or cartridge types. If you were to find that one or another of those rega tone arms sounded best, it might well be because of a favorable headshell match, assuming those 3 Rega’s might differ at the headshell.