Quality of digital cable from from source to DAC?
With respect to the transfer of digital data via metal cable in the audio spectrum, the seeming common thought I’ve managed to discern thus far is that while there is likely no apparent SQ differences to be gained in upgrading the quality of my Cat 6 ethernet cable that link my router (ATT Optical feeding an Apple Airport Extreme) to my streamer (50’ run of off the shelf Cat 6 feeding a Lumin D1), there seems to be considerable reviews claiming significant SQ improvements to be had in utilizing ‘higher quality’ digital cables linking the source (streamer or CD transport) to a DAC (Qutest). Why would this be? Is the digital data file going from the router to the streamer somehow different, or more suspect to error, than the digital data file going from the streamer to the DAC?
Any insight would be greatly appreciated, even if nothing more than passing a long a related link.
Thanks,
Todd
- ...
- 18 posts total
>> But my desire to have understanding of most things is strong, particularly when they effect both my happiness and my wallet.
<< Such understanding is where you will find the most divergence of opinions about cables. Manufacturers -- and their customers -- have many hypotheses about what makes certain cables special. (I use "hypothesis" in the scientific sense, to mean an unproven yet plausible idea -- what non-scientists often call a "theory." A theory in science is something supported by overwhelming evidence.) Most hypotheses about cables are not supported by unbiased science. Given that, it becomes a matter of what sounds better to each individual. For various reasons, it's easy to lose the distinction between slight differences and clear improvements. There are strong incentives for manufacturers and dealers to steadily increase the prices of their products, as well as to offer numerous products at various price levels. Whether they do so in good faith is not for me to say. |
mike_in_nc >>But my desire to have understanding of most things is strong, particularly when they effect both my happiness and my wallet. << Such understanding is where you will find the most divergence of opinions about cables. Manufacturers -- and their customers -- have many hypotheses about what makes certain cables special. (I use "hypothesis" in the scientific sense, to mean an unproven yet plausible idea -- what non-scientists often call a "theory." A theory in science is something supported by overwhelming evidence.) Most hypotheses about cables are not supported by unbiased science. Given that, it becomes a matter of what sounds better to each individual. For various reasons, it’s easy to lose the distinction between slight differences and clear improvements. >>>>I actually don’t agree with the major points of your paragraph. It all depends on who you talk to what theory is involved, what is fact, what is evidence and what breaks some sacred Law of Science. And to a large extent on whose ox is being gored. Yes, I know what you’re thinking - well, somebody must know. 🤗 |
@ecolnago In case of Ethernet or USB I would pay attention only to quality of shielding and run cable away from other cables. Same goes for coax S/Pdif, but matching characteristic impedance of the cable (to avoid reflections) is also very important. It is also desired to keep cable very short - less than foot (to avoid reflections) or longer than 1.5m (to avoid first reflection). With optical cable, quality of the cable (clarity, etc) plays role, but the most important is to keep system electrical noise low, by using power conditioners for the source of the signal and the DAC. |
- 18 posts total