2. misc-audio
  3. 152705-2319

Thoughts on discreet tubs, transistors vs. IC chips, op-amps.,.etc

What has been your experience with components using tubs or transistors vs., chips/op-amps..etc?  It has been some time since I have owned anything based on chips/op-amps and wondered if there had been major improvement sonically or if discreet transistors or tubes are still at the forefront?


whatjd
atdavid
736 posts
 
pragmasi,

I think itsjustme was specifically referring to resistors right on the integrated circuit, but what was stated, that they "must be semiconductors" is wrong.  They can be built from a diffused region where you take advantage of the bulk resistivity of the diffused semiconductor material (but not acting as we think a semiconductor), you can build it in the epitaxial layer, and you can diffuse thin film resistors right onto the chip. The former 2 are not very accurate and tend to be rather temperature sensitive. Thin film on chip is not very accurate unless trimmed and that would typically only be done for op-amps with on chip resistor dividers.

I completely agree with your short path arguments, though you probably need to better define accuracy.
pragmasi
212 posts
 

I think itsjustme was specifically referring to resistors right on the integrated circuit

@atdavid

Ah... okay, that makes more sense. As you imply 'accurate' is a bit of lazy shorthand... I meant an accurate rendering of the output signal into the inverting input i.e. relatively unchanged by the parasitic characteristics of the copper traces. Probably more importantly shorter traces improve the stability of the IC by presenting a low inductive load. I have generally found that compactly designed layouts are more linear.

whatjd OP
1,139 posts
 
a bit of an apology,  my keyboard "e" does not always respond...hence a word like tube can end up being tub..if I don't catch it.  And yes, my keyboard is younger than I, but does not function as well. 

itsjustme
681 posts
 
On the other hand the very geometry and small size leads to compromises, and things like connecting resistors etc. must, in reality, be semiconductors -- not metal film, carbon film, etc.

This isn't true, I use thin film smd resistors which are very easy to find and there's a much wider range of C0G/NP0 capacitors available in smd than through hole. If you look at a datasheet for an op amp the design is likely to be an entirely straight forward transistor based amplifier in a small package.

You are missing my context. I am referring to monolithic device - chips -- that contain all semiconductors, resistors etc in a package. Example - 8 pin opamp. This is true regardless of SMD or through hole.  yea, sure if we're in discrete resistor land the part selection is often BETTER in with SMDs because that's the modern packaged, designed for automated placement.

I was very clear: ( I wrote)

In general, chips allow for complex designs that would be large and costly in discrete form. They also allow for decent device matching as a side product of the monolithic process. These are good things.
On the other hand . . .
But you have to read in context! Context matters.
'later
G
More to discover