Help a guy out? Renovating home theater system after 10 years and have a few questions.


I am going to modernize my family's TV situation.  We have a 60 inch Pioneer 1080p plasma. My speakers are Paradigm Millennia with two MIllenia 20 Trio as towers and then Millenia 30s for center and surrounds.  The subwoofer is a Paradigm, but not sure what model.  The Receiver is a Denin AVR 2807. I have not done anything with it in a decade. 

I am getting an LG 86SJ9570 because why not.  The receiver definitely need to go, and I have settled on the Yamaha Aventage for no good reason. I was looking at Onkyo, but I get the sense the Yamaha may be easier for me to figure out.  My inclination is to look for more receiver than I need but buy something maybe a few years old. Whatever it is will be a learning process.

I have figured out that the model numbers reflect the series or the date.  When the Aventage came out in 2010, it was 60, 700, 800, 1000, etc.  Then they have the 810, the 820 and so on.  So we now have the 70 series.  I suspect that if I bought a 7 year old receiver, I would be missing some things that I really want or need, but I have no idea how far back I can go safely.  I cannot find a chart of the changes by series.  An RX-A1070 is $1,199 at Amazon, and an RX-A2060 is $929.  I can get a 1040 for $550 and a 1030 for $450. But I have no idea what a good cutoff point would be.  If anyone has an idea, I would really appreciate the help.

I also would be curious if my speakers make sense.  We sit about 18 feet from the TV, and I sometimes feel like there is not enough mass to the noise if that makes sense. For some reason, it seems to me like that might be more of an issue with a bigger screen.

Thanks, I really appreciate any help. 
vasubandu
I have not checked out FALD or QLED. All I can say is that in 2016 the top of the line OLED beat everything else very very easily. It has no black lighting so blacks are excepetionally black - just like plasma. Of course a $6000 TV should be significantly better than most $1500 TVs. I understand OLED prices are coming down and my wifes new Iphone X has an OLED display and so does my Nord Keyboard. Also Sony seems to have got on board with OLED. So a lot of momentum and folks voting with their feet by marching towards OLED - this is despite the extremely high cost compared to LCD or LED.

I dont know about the overall longevity of the OLED screens (a loss of brightness over time can be expected) but after a year I have ZERO screen burn in problems and I do use the OLED TV as a computer display fairly often but NOT for gaming (where burn in can be the biggest problem if you are an addict of certain games)
I have not checked out FALD or QLED. All I can say is that in 2016 the top of the line OLED beat everything else very very easily.

Very easily?

http://4k.com/tv/samsung-ks9800-review-suhd-4k-ultra-hd-240mr-smart-led-tv-un65ks9800-un78ks9500-un8...
We are an LG dealer as well as a professional Home Theater design firm.

The 86inch Oled is quite expensive so unless the OP wants to spend $15k or such this may be the reason he is looking at the 86inch LG LCD which is a very good looking TV.

As per the idea of using an older Yamaha and his existing speakers, I would not. You can buy one fantastic sounding Cambridge Audio Receiver the CX 120 right now for $1,199 which was orginally a $2k receiver or the $3,300.00 CX 200 which is now selling for $2k. No HDR but supposed to be in a software upgrade, unbelievable sound quality for the money killed a Denon in a direct comparison.

I would also look at a new speaker package that will do the room justice.

Dave and Troy
Audio Doctor NJ
     I think the LG 86SJ9570 86" LED hdtv vasubandu is going to buy would be very impressive in any room, no matter the type.  Obviously OLED would give the highest pq compared to LED or LCD whether either is utilizing something similar to Samsung's 'QLED' technology or not. 
     I know an 86" OLED hdtv panel would be ridiculously good but would also be ridiculously expensive.  I completely understand the OP deciding to substitute hdtv panel size for panel quality and save about $10-15K. 
      The sheer visual impact of watching anything on an 86" screen of even just average quality in your home's living room would likely tend to distract from  less than optimum pq issues. Overall, I think this is a wise and frugal trade-off.

Tim
       
............Obviously OLED would give the highest pq compared to LED or LCD whether either is utilizing something similar to Samsung's 'QLED' technology or not..........

Obviously?

http://4k.com/tv/samsung-ks9800-review-suhd-4k-ultra-hd-240mr-smart-led-tv-un65ks9800-un78ks9500-un8...