tangential answers to specific questions on the forum


OK, so here's a general question.

My observation has been that specific questions posed on this forum often get answered in entirely tangential ways.

For example.

QUESTION: I've narrowed by short-list down to Ayre, Hegel, and Simaudio integrated amps.  Which would you choose between those three, and why?

ANSWER TYPE #1: None of those are what you really want to buy, because they're mediocre in comparison to others.  What you should really be looking at is Plinius or, if you can stretch, Gamut.

ANSWER TYPE #2: You're coming at this all wrong.  (2A) You should be looking at tube integrateds. (2B) You should definitely be looking at separates rather than integrated, ideally a tube pre-amp combined with a high-powered solid-state power amp.

ANSWER TYPE #3: most stereo sounds dreadful.  Only I have the key to true 3-dimensional sound, but I cannot divulge what that is.

Do you find these kinds of answers (a) helpful, (b) irritating, unhelpful, and counterproductive?



128x128twoleftears
When I look at my glass of Stoli I see it half-empty and promptly fix the situation. Same here. With AGon comments I always presume that folks are having fun and feel good if my question got answered by someone. It usually does. Sidetracking or snarky comments feel fine to me. It is the personal insults disguised as "professional help" I cannot yet comprehend...
But sidetracking, No. Actually, some of the tangential answers to my latest  Q on AudioDesk CD lathe had pushed me onto CD vibration research which I hope to post real soon. 
twoleftears,

My therapist said I need to take responsibility for my behavior.  I disagreed stating you are responsible for my inane comments due to your awesome user name.

Okay, last question I promise:
  Do you have two left feet to match your ears?  

Sorry, it's a sickness
      Tim