From my perspective, all of this confirms what I eluded to....
An early original copy, most likely will sound best.
A later original copy will be marginal in relationship to the former.
What is important, an evaluation by the end user, and what attributes from either version are more in tune to him/her personal preferences.
One can chime in saying, "I like the sound of the original, lime green, RL mastered copy...but has this same person had access to an early pressing of the same lp...even more, have they taken the time to evaluate the best original to the latest MFSL?
Personally, I despise the SF forums. I prefer to find things out for myself then report. To me, this is part of the (fun) in this hobby.
An early original copy, most likely will sound best.
A later original copy will be marginal in relationship to the former.
What is important, an evaluation by the end user, and what attributes from either version are more in tune to him/her personal preferences.
One can chime in saying, "I like the sound of the original, lime green, RL mastered copy...but has this same person had access to an early pressing of the same lp...even more, have they taken the time to evaluate the best original to the latest MFSL?
Personally, I despise the SF forums. I prefer to find things out for myself then report. To me, this is part of the (fun) in this hobby.