I'm s curious as well
45 responses Add your response
Had a AS2100 through here a few months back, it was astoundingly good for its price. Did not try the Phono stage but if as good as the rest of the amp I would not worry.
For a low impedance MC cartridge the difference between 50 Ohm and 100 Ohm loading should not be that noticeable, the Shelter has a 15 Ohm impedance, not exactly "low" but it should work.
I've lived with the Yamaha A-S3000 for about 5 days now and can only say it is a truly special piece. I see the previous comments about the What HiFi review of the 3000 as I read the same review prior to my purchase. All I can say is their preference in musical reproduction must be very different than mine. This is absolutely a high end piece with sonics to match.
I currently own the A-S2000, which I have enjoyed thoroughly over the years. I've been on the hunt for another amp, solid state or tube, that offers a significant upgrade in sound for the price. So far I haven't found that amp. I would say the biggest weakness of the 2000 is the bass extension. I'm also considering a Pass Labs INT-30A, which should have a similar sound signature, but not sure how that would compare to the 2100 or even the 3000.
Has anyone been able to compare the 2000 to the 2100 or 3000?
The A-S2000 I think has much better bass response when using the balanced inputs. The bass punch with the 2000 is definitely good, it's mainly the extension that I feel is a bit lacking. It doesn't go as low as my PrimaLuna Dialogue Premium.
I used to own a pair of Golden Ear Triton 3 speakers that had built in subs, and I would really notice the difference there.
Happy New Year.
I am probably a few weeks out from ordering the Yamaha A-S3000.
For those who have it, how do you like it? Any regrets? Anyone else thinking of buying one?
Some of the reviews that I've read are stellar. I had a Yamaha receiver in college that I just recently gave to a friend.
From the description of the sound in the reviews, seems like it's a perfect fit for me.
I have a question for A-s2100/A-s3000 users. When you use the "main direct" input, I know the As3000 volume control is bypassed. Basically, you would hook an outboard preamp and use the Yamaha as a tradition stereo amp. My question is that when you do use the "Main Direct", are the tone controls bypassed as well or are they still functional?
"I have a question for A-s2100/A-s3000 users. When you use the "main direct" input, I know the As3000 volume control is bypassed. Basically, you would hook an outboard preamp and use the Yamaha as a tradition stereo amp. My question is that when you do use the "Main Direct", are the tone controls bypassed as well or are they still functional?"
Below is an excerpt from Yamaha's description of the A-S1000 which I have:
"Note: The volume and tone controls do not effect the amplifiers Main Direct Input or Record Output."
Being that all the analog A-S integrateds have the same design volume/tone controls, I would say this applies to the 2100 and 3000 also.
From Crutchfield website:
As willand mentions above the tone controls of the Yamaha AS3000 are bypassed in main direct mode. I use my AS3000 primarily for stereo listening with an Hegel HD11 DAC but I do have the left and right preamp channels of my home theatre receiver (Yamaha RXA3030) connected to the AS3000 main direct input allowing the receiver to have preamp control for movies. The receiver's amps handle center and surround, the AS3000's amps handle left and right. Works and sounds great, and keeps me from having to switch out speaker cables every time I go back and forth from stereo mode to movie mode. But again most of my time is spent listening to the 3000 stereo only.
I'm now a couple of weeks in with the AS3000 and am loving it. Absolutely no regrets. I find the review by stevehuffphoto on line to very accurately describe the sound almost point for point with my findings. Lots of late night listening lately.
Thanks for your info. Keep us posted as it breaks in more. I'll probably have to settle for an A s2100 unless A4L gets a refurbished 3000 in silver (I really do not want black). I would love someone to compare the sound differences between the two (the 2100 vs 3000). Obviously, the 3000 will have it beat hands down, but would like to hear someone's opinion on how much better.
That's great because I love the silver version.Agreed. There's something really nice about the silver version with the black gloss side panels. Sound is what really matters but it's a real bonus to have such a nice looking integrated. I bet the black version is pretty nice in person as well. I love the meters but I do find I have them off a majority of the time. I do wish you could turn the lights off with the meters still active.
Aberyclark I noticed A4L has the A-S1100 in silver which is similar to the A-S2100 but not a balanced design. Would love to see a comparison of all three.
Aberyclark I noticed A4L has the A-S1100 in silver which is similar to the A-S2100 but not a balanced design. Would love to see a comparison of all three.I would too. I'd be curious if the 1100 is basically an "unbalanced" version of the 2100. I highly doubt it since the price difference is quite large.
"Aberyclark I noticed A4L has the A-S1100 in silver which is similar to the A-S2100 but not a balanced design. Would love to see a comparison of all three."I would too. I'd be curious if the 1100 is basically an "unbalanced" version of the 2100. I highly doubt it since the price difference is quite large."
From my observation, the 1100 is an unbalanced 2100 with 4/18000uf power caps instead of 4/22000uf. There may be more differences but that is something I am certain of.
I have had the Yamaha A-S3000 for two and a half months now and I wanted to report back and post a few comments. My wife bought me a new Mac mini for my birthday (I'm a lucky guy) and I optimized it for use as a dedicated music server combined with my Hegel HD11 DAC plus a few other tweaks. I would describe the system as full bodied, holographic, detailed, big. I tend to roll my eyes a little when I hear someone describe the sound of a solid state amp as "tube sounding" but I gotta tell you the 3000 is the closest thing to power tubes I've ever had with SS. No, not quite the 3D midrange magic compared to my previous tubes, but playing in the same ball park, and with better bass. I would love to try the matching CD/SACD player (CD-S3000) even though I don't spin discs much anymore but I really want to hear what it has to offer via USB. But there's that little matter of I can't even begin to afford the CD player. Even so, for my tastes, I'm thrilled with how things currently sit.
Skoczylas, unfortunately I do not have any experience with the phono stage in the 3000 nor a table I can use to test.
When I first bought the Yamaha I tried both single ended and balanced and preferred balanced. It wasn't really a fair comparison though but in any event I have used balanced and haven't looked back. When I get some time I'll swap single ended back in and do a quick comparison.
I'm not much of a headphone guy but I do listen periodically when noise may be an issue for the wife and daughter and I will say that the internal headphone amp is very good in the 3000, making my Focal Spirit Professionals the week link IMO. As a side note I would be fine with the Focal headphones but I do find them uncomfortable for extended listening.
Just wanted to let every one who is intrested in Buying ahigh end integrated amplifier, the AS 3000 is the most natural amplifier you will find on the market at its price range.
It does only one thing, increase the signal, noting more, no tricks, no alterations to the sound, no enhanced frequencies (ps, what hi fi didnt pay attension to that and it only shows that they dont know how to test high end equipment). The sound will be as good as your source and the recordings.
The phono stage is as good as it gets in an Integrated amplifier.
All the shortcomings of your system will be exposed so if you gear is not up to the task and you are after suger coated sound buy something else, if you are after natural, true to life, warm sound then buy it without regrets, its an amplifier for life.
I used the phono section of the A-S3000 for a while with an Ortofon Quintet Black. It was really good, but I moved up to a Parasound JC3+ as I was still wanting more out of my vinyl. Compating the two, at the same volume setting, the JC3+ is easily ~50-60% louder than the on-board phonostage and at the same time ~75-80% lower noise floor. I would say if you are just getting into vinyl and have any MM cart or a more musical MC (think like a Quintet Blue or Cadenza Bronze) then the on-board phono would be perfect for you. If you have a higher-end table and are hungry for dynamic range, "slam", and power/presence at lower volumes, then you will want a higher-end separate.
Hope that helps! Glad to hear others enjoying this fine Yammy!
@erik_squires I don’t have Yamaha as3000 to compare to the Luxman but let me tell you Luxman was overpriced compare to Yamaha , I have own top of the line Marantz pm11 and I have to compare it with my Yamaha as2100 retail prices was 3500 and my Yamaha as2100 was better than the Marantz cost 4500 , Luxman , Marantz was made in Japan so you have to pay them premium prices compare to Yamaha made in Malaysia that why it is cheaper but the sound of Yamaha is so natural and smooth , you will pay more for Luxman, Marantz , McIntosh they are overpriced , I still own a Yamaha receiver for the last 25 years and it still working without any issues that made me love my Yamaha even more