XLR to RCA interconnect. Does mixed connectors provide less noise compared RCA to RCA?


I am currently using Signal Audio Cable which is XLR to RCA. between the pre-outs of Rogue integrated amp and a Balanced Audio Technology VK-200 amp which has both XLR  and RCA connectors.  I

 was holding out to replace the Rogue with either a BAT pre-amp with both XLR and RCA or another brand of pre-amp which is equal to the BAT.   However, I got a great deal on a Conrad Johnson PV-14L SE ( with the upgraded caps) which has all RCA's. 

My questions is it worth getting the same XLR to RCA to connect an Ayre CX7e mp CD player which has  XLR outputs to the CJ preamp's CD inputs, or just stay with the Harmonic Technology "Truth Link" RCA to RCA  IC  ( previous model but highly rated) I currently use. 

Is there one brand of XLR to RCA interconnects that is better sounding than others. I almost bought  a Mogami XLR to RCA, but it was too long and more money.    Thank you

sunnyjim
Hi Jim,

I’d suggest asking Ayre, as I suspect the most significant factor that would be involved is how the balanced and unbalanced output circuits of the CDP are implemented. But FWIW my guess is that changing to an XLR-to-RCA cable is unlikely to provide any benefit.

If you do go with an XLR-to-RCA cable, however, MAKE SURE that it does not ground either of the two signals in the balanced signal pair. My impression is that most such cables, and also most XLR-to-RCA adapters, connect pin 3 (which carries a signal) to pin 1 (ground). That would be appropriate when adapting an RCA output to an XLR input, but can cause problems or conceivably even damage in many cases when adapting an XLR output to an RCA input. This thread, which also involved a solid state CDP, being an example.

Good luck with the new preamp! Regards,
-- Al
Well done, Jim. You finally found a good preamp.

Good advice by Al to call Ayre. Most adapters do tie ground pin 1 to pin 3 as l have found, and Al has commented on other threads.
A follow-up to my previous post: I took a look at the manual for the CDP. It states:
It is not normally recommended to use both sets of analog outputs simultaneously.
Also, Stereophile’s measurements of an earlier version of the player show output amplitudes and impedances that are exactly twice as much for the balanced outputs as for the unbalanced outputs.

The relevance of all of this is that it suggests that the signal provided to the RCA connector for each channel is not independently buffered relative to the signals provided to the XLR connector, and that the RCA connector is wired directly to XLR pin 2. Meaning that both XLR pin 2 and the RCA connector are being driven with the same signal from the same output circuit. Which would seem to confirm that changing to an XLR-to-RCA cable is unlikely to be helpful.

Best regards,
-- Al

Like another has said, the negative-polarity signal pin in an XLR-to-RCA cable is usually connected to ground/shield (if at all).  There is no benefit to getting an XLR-to-RCA cable instead of just an RCA cable unless the XLR connector on the one side is superior to what RCA connector is available.  There is absolutely no signal difference between these cables, as the target devices (i.e. amp) will only use the one RCA signal wire anyways.  The only real benefit that you might get is if you run a true XLR cable and then use a Jenson Transformer XLR-to-RCA converter right next to the amplifier.  You're spending a lot more money here.

Better off just to get a really good RCA cable in this situation.

There are possible changes either way, but not enough to spend a weekend trying to figure out which is which. :)

Your ideal (though not often something you can hear) is XLR to XLR.

One reason to go TO an XLR at the amp is when the XLR inputs have greater impedance than the RCA equivalents, often XLR inputs are double. If the preamp is sensitive (like many tube preamps are) then the higher the input impedance of the amp, the better.

Using an XLR output to RCA may help isolate from ground loops as the RCA pin and shield will be actively driven, with very high impedance to ground and the shield only connected on one end.

Best,

Erik
I was going to suggest the Jensen Transformers, but Auxinput beat me to it. Though I would disagree that they are 'a lot of money'. For $300 bucks, they cost less than many RCA cables, and XLR should provide you more audible improvement for the money.
One reason to go TO an XLR at the amp is when the XLR inputs have greater impedance than the RCA equivalents, often XLR inputs are double.
Usually, although not always, the reason for the doubled impedance on XLR interfaces (inputs or outputs) compared to RCA interfaces is simply that the XLR spec reflects the sum of the impedances of the two signal legs. And the impedances of the two legs are generally made equal, to optimize noise rejection. So driving a single-ended signal into one leg of a balanced input, with the other leg of the input grounded, will in most cases not improve impedance compatibility compared to an RCA-to-RCA connection of the same equipment. And for the same reason an XLR-to-XLR connection will often result in an impedance ratio between two components that is no different than an RCA-to-RCA connection between the same components.

Although in some designs, in which the XLR and RCA interfaces are handled by circuit stages that are separate and independent, the balanced and unbalanced impedances may differ by either more than or less than the factor of two that is commonly seen.
Using an XLR output to RCA may help isolate from ground loops as the RCA pin and shield will be actively driven, with very high impedance to ground and the shield only connected on one end.
Assuming a direct XLR to RCA connection is made (i.e., a transformer such as one of the Jensen models is not being used), obviously a return conductor must be provided between the two components, whether it be a shield or, alternatively, a conductor within a shield that is connected at just one end. Assuming the RCA input is unbalanced (a balanced RCA input would be very unusual), if that return conductor is actively driven the actively driven signal will usually end up being connected to the destination component’s circuit ground, which in turn will usually be connected to that component’s AC safety ground through some low impedance or in some cases even directly. Not good news either way, with hum or conceivably even damage very possibly resulting.

As suggested by some of the others a Jensen transformer (or at a considerably higher price point something like an SMc Audio Flex-Connect, which is also transformer based) is the ideal way of interconnecting XLR and RCA interfaces.

Best regards,
-- Al

The only real benefit that you might get is if you run a true XLR cable and then use a Jenson Transformer XLR-to-RCA converter
The Jensen Iso-Max is a good device. As auxinput stated, you can
use a fully balanced XLR cable from the CDP and convert the signal to RCA . The question is whether or not this will result in superior sonics compared to a good RCA interconnect.

The Jensen unit does require a low to medium impedance cable be used. I found the Jensen to be very transparent sonically, so the sonic signature of the interconnects being used remain true.
http://www.jensen-transformers.com/product/pc-2xr/

Thank you to all who responded. I wish I had relatives who were as courteous.

Nevertheless, I need to  study each response.

BTW, there is a toggle switch on the back of  the Ayre CD player that offers either RCA or XLR  connectors.  More than likely I will buy a better XLR to RCA interconnect if such exists  than the Signal Audio cable. 

 As far as CD player, I currently use an older Harmonic Technology  "Truth Link" IC which sounds good and is well made. The speaker cables are HT's Reference Pro 11+ which was highly praised in past reviews.  No BS in the reviews, the cables are  highly coherent and deliver good sound. Unfortunately, they as thick as an Anaconda snake.

P.S.  We all know that as soon as you make a :"mighty" product decision, something else pops up on the radar.  In this case, it is a almost mint BAT VK-3i tube pre-amp with remote. It offers both XLR and RCA inputs. It is tempting to buy it and pllay Russian roulette with the CJ and the BAT pre-amps.  It is available by a vendor on e-bay that sells by auction only 

However, I don't want to give the wife more ammunition to commit me

Alas, happy holidays to all   sunnyjim  


 

Question for Almarg - Al,  would the impedance of the XLR be different to the RCA - if so could that have an impact on sound qualjty?

Any thoughts as to which one should have the greater impedance

Thanks

Hi Steve (Williewonka),

In this particular case, per my second post in the thread it appears very likely that the RCA output of the CDP is provided with the same signal that is provided to XLR pin 2 (the non-inverted signal in the balanced signal pair). Assuming that is the case, there would of course be no difference in impedance or any other signal characteristics between those two points. And if an adapter cable is used, XLR pin 2 is what would be routed to the RCA input of the preamp.

A lot of components which provide both RCA and XLR outputs are designed that way. And likewise in many cases for components which provide RCA and XLR inputs. In many of those cases involving inputs the center pin of the RCA connector and pin 2 of the XLR connector are wired together, and a switch is provided to ground pin 3 of the XLR connector when the RCA input is being used.

In some other designs, though, separate and independent driver or receiver stages are provided for the RCA and XLR connectors. In those cases, of course, impedances as well as overall sonic performance can differ in either direction depending on the specific design.

Sunnyjim 11-21-2016
BTW, there is a toggle switch on the back of the Ayre CD player that offers either RCA or XLR connectors.
Are you sure about that, Jim? I’ve looked at the manual and at several rear panel photos and the only switches I see are one that turns the player’s digital output on or off (the digital output is provided on an XLR connector, as AES/EBU), and a switch that selects between "measure" and "listen" modes.

Best regards,
-- Al

Almarg, I have to check the back of the CD player, or I should have checked the manual first before responding  However, I will check with Ayre tomorrow . 

Thanks again, and to all who have responded with sound advice. and comments.  SJ     

In case its not obvious, the crux of this is that single-ended and balanced connections are inherently incompatible. That’s why Jensen transformers can be an excellent solution as transformers can convert from one to the other with ease.

I figure balanced is the way to go myself. But if your preamp is single-ended though there’s not much point in using a different cable (it’s single-ended regarldess of the connector). Just run RCAs to the amplifier have done with it.

 TO atmasphere,   Your last point is well taken

Despite a wealth of technical knowledge provided to this thread's question,  t might be better to stick with RCA to RCA connections. As it stands, the Ayre CD player seems to fair well with the 'older"  version of Harmonic Technology's "Truth Link" IC  which received a lot of good press. 

 However, my experiment with the  Signal Audio XLR to RCA interconnect I used first to hook up my BAT VK 200 amp to the Rogue pre-outs, may need rethinking how that I purchased the CJ PV14LSE which is all RCA's.

Regardless, of the more than  satisfactory sound the Signal cable delivers, it might be worth replacing it with a higher quality RCA interconnect that is superior in sound quality and signal delivery  I may have abdicated the noise reduction benefits of XLR to XLR IC's by buying the CJ,  but on the other hand may gain much in sound quality across the board  by finding a newer IC with better synergy between the CJ and BAT components.   Thanks to all who responded,  SJ