I use Roon to upsample my Lumin T2 playback to DSD 512. I absolutely love the sound, better sound staging side to side, back to back plus a more natural presentation of details. I don't get fatigued or hear a sound that is bleached or unnatural sounding. Another of example of different ears in different rooms with different gear. I agree completely with Audiotroy's post.
Why you want upsampling and upconversion in a server and why it sounds way better!
One of Roon's and Jrivers best advantages is the ability to digitally reprocess your data.
With an appropriate server you can take for example a 16 bit 44k Tidal stream and reprocess that data stream to DSD or to reprocess to 24bit 192k, 384k, even up to 768k.
In our tests almost accross the board most listeners perfer DSD or high res PCM data streams.
The counter arguement is that if you start with 16 bit 44k sample you can't do any better as that is the source.
Going through Facebook we got a post that showed the Lumiere brothers first film shot in 1894 with a steam locomotive.
The second video showed the same Lumiere video reprocessed using AI to create a 4k video stream out of the same video footage.
The first video is the native source the second shows the reprocessed video the differences aren't subtitle even if you reprocess the native video you are able to extract a signifigantly higher quality image.
We have been saying this for years even if you don't start out with a true high res source through the magic of computer reprocessing you can create a pseudo high res data packet that still sound far better than ifs original form.
https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/02/someone-used-neural-networks-to-upscale-a-famous-1896-video-to-4k-quality/
Watch the video and see what you think. Sure it is always best to start with a true high resolution image but in the case of not having a true high resolution music fille the ability to use digital reprocessing can create a signal that will sound far better providing that your dac and server are up to the task.
Dave and Troy
Audio Doctor NJ
With an appropriate server you can take for example a 16 bit 44k Tidal stream and reprocess that data stream to DSD or to reprocess to 24bit 192k, 384k, even up to 768k.
In our tests almost accross the board most listeners perfer DSD or high res PCM data streams.
The counter arguement is that if you start with 16 bit 44k sample you can't do any better as that is the source.
Going through Facebook we got a post that showed the Lumiere brothers first film shot in 1894 with a steam locomotive.
The second video showed the same Lumiere video reprocessed using AI to create a 4k video stream out of the same video footage.
The first video is the native source the second shows the reprocessed video the differences aren't subtitle even if you reprocess the native video you are able to extract a signifigantly higher quality image.
We have been saying this for years even if you don't start out with a true high res source through the magic of computer reprocessing you can create a pseudo high res data packet that still sound far better than ifs original form.
https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/02/someone-used-neural-networks-to-upscale-a-famous-1896-video-to-4k-quality/
Watch the video and see what you think. Sure it is always best to start with a true high resolution image but in the case of not having a true high resolution music fille the ability to use digital reprocessing can create a signal that will sound far better providing that your dac and server are up to the task.
Dave and Troy
Audio Doctor NJ