why are two subs harder to place than full range?


sorry if this is a dumb question, but i notice that whenever someone talks about getting stereo subs there usually ensues much hand wringing over placement and room modes, etc., but this rarely is the case when someone talks about full range speakers with large 10 or 12 inch woofers (with or without built in amps for them).

Is there a sound technical basis for this different treatment or is it merely convenience, i.e., since subs can be moved about separately from main speakers, then it makes more since to talk about eliminating room modes by moving them around?

I'm getting a second sub for a rather large vaulted room, have an injured back, and would rather minimize what seems like a rather long process, at least for the time being by just keeping the subs with the mains.

thanks
thomp9015

Showing 1 response by shadorne

I'm getting a second sub for a rather large vaulted room, have an injured back, and would rather minimize what seems like a rather long process, at least for the time being by just keeping the subs with the mains.

The best spot is often away from the corner and close to the side wall and a few feet in front of your main speakers (assuming you have full range) I find the best way to integrate is to run the main speakers full range if they are big bad boys with big sub sized woofers themselves.

I would never place a sub or main speakers in the corner unless you want pure impact for HT - as you are talking room modes galore...