Why are the Infinity IRS, Reference 1b, Beta ect speakers passive on the mids and highs?
I would like to know why all of the classic Infinity's and most other brands use passive crossovers for the mid to high transition? I don't think it was for cost and that level. Is passive better? Has anyone compared both to know which is better?
Pots are always a problem when old in any speaker, you replace the pots with appropriate resistor L pad power resistors of the same values for your preferred setting.
The quality of the passive xovers in those higher end Infinity’s were beyond reproach, and for the mids and highs far better than listening through the half a dozen opamps per channel of an active xover.
But for the bass, yes by all means use an active xover as then it can be direct coupled, which is always better for bass.
Why are the Infinity IRS, Reference 1b, Beta ect speakers passive on the mids and highs?
I think they found as I did. (with both ways bi-amped) I found good passive 18db xovers on the upper bass/ mids and highs of my Martin Logan ESL Monoliths III sounds more natural than any active crossover I tried, they all had a sterility to sound. But on the 12" bass 150hz down I use and my own 24db active.
You must have a verified phone number and physical address in order to post in the Audiogon Forums. Please return to Audiogon.com and complete this step. If you have any questions please contact Support.