Which Audiologic dac was the first to go 24 bit?

Jerry said the old chips would be used if they were still available.
036851b6 1464 4fdb 9fa6 4cfbddffba4dtabl10s
I think it was the 2400; I got a late model 34, and it had the 20-bit chips. Some of us upgraded our Model 34s to install the 24 bit chips.
Rcprince is correct.
I'm keeping my M34 DSM in original form (except for special tubes) to me it sounds absolutely fantastic,
(mine was Jerry's own personal unit a while back)
Newer is not always better, just different, sometimes worse, depending on ancillary equipment & preferences.
Was there a difference in sound between the two?
The difference in sound was not really that much at all, and Jerry told me that before I made the switch; I only did it because I expected Classic Records to release a lot of great DADs (which they didn't) and because I liked the Purcell upsampler (which I still like, but after taking it out I think it added too much noise to the signal and lost some of the AL's delicacy) which could output a 24-bit signal. Unless you have a source that sends out a true 24-bit digital signal you're better off with the 20-bit chips, which Jerry apparently felt were very good. In my case, the 24-bit chips still are a plus, because I am friends with a couple of recording engineers (one professional, one amateur) who have 24-bit/96khz machines, so I can listen to their master tapes through my unit.
I don't think he's going to install the 20 bits. If you guy's don't know, the Altis is a Bitstream machine.
Rx8man - Hello - your comment about "special tubes" caught my attention, as I have been wanting to try another set in my M34 dsm, purchased here used a couple years ago. We will be moving shortly; so, while the system is taken down, I thought it would be the opportune time to install new tubes, since I have no idea about the previous history of the stock unit. Also, my owner's manual apparently is missing the "tube placement diagram" page. I've never purchased a tube in my life, but figured I would contact Andy at Vintage Tube after reading about him here on the forum, and then at his website. Would you be willing to share your "special" ingredients.
Thanks very much for any suggestions you might care to provide.
Best regards,
Pat (Rx8man).....do you want to talk about tubes
in the M34, or do you want me to jump in at this
Hey Jeffcott go for it, thanks for the offer !!
I thought that Jerry told me that the 24 chip was better when I was buying my used AL unit 34 that had the chip upgrade. I guess I was wrong. Hmmmm. I think I have some Amperex 6922 gold pins in the unit as well as some Amperex 7308s??? They sound much better then the stock tubes. Rcprince has much more experience then I do and I am not sure if the tubes I am quoting are the ones the unit has, if I get corrected then I'll have to check into it further.

Happy Listening.
Pat and I have spoken a number of times regarding tubes in the M34, but I didn't want to steal his thunder. I have an M34DSB which, like Pat, I love and enjoy.

As regards your question about tube placement in the 34, looking from the front, the 12AU7 pair is on the left side (in line) and the 6DJ8 is on the right side (also in line).

As regards tube rolling, I had the occasion to speak with Jerry Ozment a few months back and he (to my hearing) confirmed my perception that the DAC is significantly more sensitive to 12AU7 selection than to 6DJ8 selection. I would suggest that you start there. I am a long way from trying everything but I have tried a few inclusive of Sylvania yellow labels, RCA's Black Plate 12AU7s, 5814a's and 5963's, and Siemens Silver Plates. Pat has used Amperex Bugle Boys so he will need to chime in on his comparison there (sorry Pat, I still have not gotten that done.

Observations: in my experience, the LARGEST improvement with this DAC and tubes has been isolation. When I put a Townshend Seismic Sink under the DAC, all of the rules changed. I would encourage anyone with this DAC to start there. It really levels the playing field. Yes, better tubes are still better, but the spread is definitely reduced.

As regards tube dampers, I think they are mandatory and the Herbies Halo-9's are a nice damper. I use 'em.

Tube observations: IMO, one of the best "affordable" tubes is the 1950's production Black Plate RCA 12AU7. Without isolation, they can be a bit bright and shrill, but put a sink under them and they get magic. They do cymbals wonderfully. A tube with a softer top end sound is the Black Plate 5814A. This was my preferred tube for quite some period of time. If you feel that CD playback has just a bit of an edge, try this tube.

My tube of choice at the present (as I have been fortunate enough to find a pair) is the Siemens Silver Plate ECC82. These tubes are scarce, but I just love them. Some have described them as the pinnacle of the 12AU7 family. All I can say is that they do everything just right for my tastes.

In terms of the 6DJ8 slot, I have used both Bugle Boys and Amperex PQ's. The PQ's were an improvment, but it was a SMALL improvement. On my list of to try tubes in this position are Brimar, Siemens and Tungsram.

If anyone is interested, email me off-line and I will send you a copy of my notes on tubes that you are interested in, and a slough of links to entertain yourself with.

Tburn, if you wish to try any of the above RCA's or Sylvania's, let me know. I have extras and would sell you enough inexpensively to get a good taste. These are inexpensive tubes.
Thanks Gary, you said it better than I could !!
BTW, the RCA 12AU7's are sounding primo.
The other side is running a pair of Cryo'd Russian 6H23N-EB's, life is good.
Hi Jeffcott - thanks so much for your detailed discussion. As I don't consider myself a "paying" customer, I didn't feel it right to infringe upon Mr. Ozment's time concerning tube selection. It's apparent that you gentlemen have spent quite some time and effort in the quest, so I am very appreciative of your willingness to offer your observations to this neophyte.

After the aforementioned household move, my 2 ch. system will reside in a dedicated room, along with the components finding a new resting position upon a Sistrum SP-4 rack - so I'm hoping that this will adequately address the isolation enhancement you feel is important. (As an aside, I recently made the acquaintance of a local Audiogoner thru the forum, and I'm sure he would attest to my current hodge-podge 2 ch/ HT arrangement - I'm chomping at the bit to get things set-up properly. It perhaps may be a mistake to make all these changes - room, rack, tube rolling, etc - at once, but am afraid I don't have the patience any longer to do it methodically.) I will also act upon your suggestion for using the tube dampeners.

And thanks for the offer - I'll be in touch via email.

I'll chime in:

1. Isolation does make a difference with this DAC. I use a K-Works IsobaseK, and prior to that a Seismic Sink. Both made a big difference, as noted above.

2. For tubes, I agree in the units without the transformer upgrade, the 12AU7s have the biggest effect on the sound. I've always been a Telefunken fan, and I used both Tele 12AU7s and ECC802s in there. The Teles probably are a little rich around 200hz or so, because after I got the transformer upgrade I could hear a slight dip at that crossover frequency in my speaker system, where the satellites pass over to the woofers (fixed that with a phase control). Jerry used to use Mullards in there, which I found lively but with just a little too much glare for me. For the 6922s/6DJ8s, I've settled on Siemens, both Ccas and ECC88s as my tubes of choice. The Sovteks are OK, but not in the same league. I've also heard people claim the NOS Sylvanias work well in this DAC; perhaps if Joe Kubala is around he'll elaborate.
Hey - thanks to all you guys who've responded about tubes here. I will never ceased to be amazed at the level of knowledge you fellas possess for this hobby. Talk about feeling like a ditch-digger at an Aeronautical Engineering Society luncheon - sheesh!
Have a great weekend ...
Hoe does the transformer upgrade improve the sound?
I use a Wadia 270se with GNSC mods to drive my Audio Logic DAC-like to hear other Audio Logic owners chime in with the Digital IC their using
I've been using an Orchid balanced between my CEC & Audio Logic Dac with excellent results, like to try a couple others for comparison.
Powder - using a Jena Labs Valkyrie digital XLR between a Mephisto II transport and my M34 dac. I just kinda dove off into the deep end, so sorry to say can't really offer any comparisons. Other than to say all my CD's are quite listenable :-)
Tab110s--read my review of the transformer upgrade for my impressions. Curious to see how others feel about it.
Do you still favor Tele's overall? I wonder if 6N1P's could be used?