Editorial:
I think as a matter of professional courtesy that Audiogon should get permission before listing a members add on another site. Beyond the professional courtesy I think there are also legal obligations.
We have an obligation to Audiogon and Audiogon members; it is my opinion that Audiogon has an obligation legal or other wise to let the members know how their listings are being used. No matter how good the intentions, there is a contract between Audiogon and each member for each add. Members pay for that service. Ads should not be used or listed elsewhere without the knowledge and permission of the listing member.
This situation could be easily addressed if Audiogon amended their agreement with its members, as long as the member agrees.
It is not my intention to attack Audiogon. I do feel that an open line of communication is always good for everyone. Audiogon seems to have dropped the ball on this one.
Just my thoughts on this matter
I think as a matter of professional courtesy that Audiogon should get permission before listing a members add on another site. Beyond the professional courtesy I think there are also legal obligations.
We have an obligation to Audiogon and Audiogon members; it is my opinion that Audiogon has an obligation legal or other wise to let the members know how their listings are being used. No matter how good the intentions, there is a contract between Audiogon and each member for each add. Members pay for that service. Ads should not be used or listed elsewhere without the knowledge and permission of the listing member.
This situation could be easily addressed if Audiogon amended their agreement with its members, as long as the member agrees.
It is not my intention to attack Audiogon. I do feel that an open line of communication is always good for everyone. Audiogon seems to have dropped the ball on this one.
Just my thoughts on this matter