What in the world is going on.....


My system cost about 75000 dollars or so.  I got the rave review LP of the new Paul Simon album.....sounded pretty lousy.  I listened to the included M3P download using AirPlay through my Denon receiver and Senheisser wireless earphones, and it sounded wonderful......   What in the world is that all about....
128x128stringreen
Post removed 
Tonyk,
Sorry to see your post removed. Audiogon sometimes is not reasonable when it comes to 'cleaning'.

I know you didn't mean to be rude pal.

Well, bad recording will of course sound bad on anything but it will still sound better with better equipment. You are talking nonsense.


Maybe I didn't say that correctly then,,IMO if you take a poorly mastered cd and play it through a very expensive,very detailed system it will sound horrible..same cd played through a less revealing(more often a more musical one) system and to me the music presents itself better..Ive heard modest setups that blow away these high dollar, state of the art,no compromise ones...my modest setup to me is way more enjoyable than the big dollar one I had ...plus I have more money to buy music and that's always a good thing in my book.

Thanks for your opinion. Opinions are like (well, you know) and everyone has one. You’re entitled to yours. Thanks for showing it to us.

P.S. Check page 1 and 2 of this thread and you can read what I said. It hasn’t been deleted! There’s no reason why it would be.
@missioncoonery - what is your current system & what was your 'big dollar' system? 
"Well, bad recording will of course sound bad on anything but it will still sound better with better equipment. You are talking nonsense."

Inna, I honestly feel differently. My current high resolution system unveils the badness of the bad recording more than the ordinary stereo I had before. It's very annoying for me to keep listening to bad sounding recording with my high resolution system, even I love them. Now I listen to them only with Bose in my car. My friend said that high resolution system is rather selective, and I didn't disagree.
I'll take some extra badness if there is much more goodness along with it. Good music is often not recorded very well, this doesn't mean that we all have to listen to it on boomboxes. And if a 'high resolution' system makes the overall experience worse than lower resolution one, this means that either that 'high resolution' system is in fact junk or that the listener cannot tolerate the increased resolution.
If I fixated on negative I couldn't listen to any recording I like. There is a lot of garbage and distortion there.
Stringreen, do all tracks sound bad, or are some worse than others? I've read that they used to reduce the bass on albums because too much bass could cause the needle to jump out of the groove. There's some pretty serious bass on Wristband.

I think the CD sounds good.

inna, thank you for the response. I agree, the problem is I'm now too conscious of the sound quality of the recoding after I bought my high resolution system. Once I accustomed to it, it would be OK, I wish.
I heard this recording on Tidal HiFi, and it sounds good to me. This is not a particularly bad sounding recording, I think.
I wouldn't say this is a bad sounding recording but rather there are some bad sounds on the recording.
Ok you find Bob Dylan and the Beatles boring? So you didn't Traveling Wilburys or you never heard of them right?  (sometimes shortened to the Wilburys) were a British-American supergroup consisting of Bob Dylan, George Harrison, Jeff Lynne, Roy Orbison, and Tom Petty. The band recorded two albums, the first in 1988 and the second in 1990, though Orbison died before the second was recorded.
 I can list a bunch of people that probably have Grammy's and are in the Rock hall of fame that suck!  But you probably like Bon-Jovi and Kiss, Michael Jackson right? ( PUKE! ) and others that people love for what I have no fricking idea? To each his own I guess , well I'll listen to Buddy Guy,Todd Rundgren Luther Allison, John McLaughlin, Jeff Beck ( who your probably saying ?) These are real musicians that if that was your reaction maybe you should look them up on YouTube! Or just be happy with the commercial crap like everyone else - the record companies will be happy to give you all you want along with their lame awards! This has been going on Forever! God I suppose you don't think Eric Clapton, or Santana have any talent either?  Where do you people come from please go back to your pathetic music and life where ever you come from!
If I have to tell you why you should buy these then you don't get it any way! Here are a couple of links for you people that don't know who they are? I have seen Todd over two hundred times and have never wanted my money back! Only missed a couple from the list below in the last 40 years!!!

Todd Rundgren   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BgNSwUmio_s
 Buddy Guy         https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WaFMC8ODHf0
Haven't heard his latest but the last album was sort of a "meh" for my tastes…however, I recently listened to my (I think) original LP of his first solo album and was impressed with how good it sounded.
Clapton, Santana and Beck can be okay though not really impressive, and John McLaughlin is in a league of his own as a guitar player. However, for the last twenty or so years what he has been playing does not impress me at all, unless he plays older compositions. His music appears to have run out. Well, he is 74.
If having a system worth upwards of $75k could make an album sound better I'd be squirreling away money to buy one - but I'll probably be dead before that happens. 

I play golf, badly, and not often as I'd like to. I could literally spend a couple thousand bucks on better clubs but...I'd still be a pretty below average shagger. 

Stringreen, I most certainly am not casting aspersions on your system or making light of its cost. Nor am I doubting its value to you. If I had the funds I'd have one, too. 

Poor recordings/pressings et al have been around for as long as I can remember. I can recall playing records in the '70's that I thought were awful sonically. I've been listening to Simon's latest recently and have found it to be pretty dismissable content-wise, compared to his previous releases at least IMHO, and the sonics are definitely more in-your-face. I have it on LP and an HDtracks flac download.  The LP sounds better overall. I listen to my digital through a Sony HAPZ1es. 

I just find the content of this release missing somewhat, the strength of the tunes?  "So Beautiful..." has a great collection of material. 

I HAVE noticed that transferring files to the HAP is better executed using LAN than wifi. It's faster for one, and secondly it's less prone to bandwidth issues than when I wifi them. (Can "wifi" be a verb, too?) I've noticed that there are burps in many of the tracks that went via wifi. It could be my imagination but I'll swear to it. 

I use Tidal, iTunes, HDtracks and Amazon to hear stuff now because there are but a handful of stores remaining to do so in person. A couple of hours doing that and you'll hear the differences on all the recordings.  It's just there. 

Happy listening, peeps!

Oblgny....that's just the point.....Fremmer gave this record's sound, performance, and content a rave review....Simon is and has been one of my favorites.   This recording just doesn't make it on MY system....and wondering why.  (as an aside I was REALLY amazed and disappointed at Paul's performance at the Democratic convention....out of tune, garbled words, phoned in....)
That performance at the DNC was....good gosh. Well intentioned though it was, I was cringing. 

Phoned in?  That would have been a wise decision!  But one performance, one rendition doesn't negate a career that has been pretty damn amazing.  

Recent additions to my system have me flipping vinyl more often than listening digitally.  Even my vintage vinyl sounds great.  
Paul Simon has been past his prime since the 80's.

All these performers that hit their peak in the 70's, should "hang it up" IMO!
It's their business whether to keep playing or not, question is who is going to listen to that playing?
I'm SHOCKED, shocked to learn that not everyone on this forum has the same musical tastes. Even the original poster of this thread admitted that on headphones, Paul Simon's "Stranger to Stranger" sounded "wonderful". Look, you may not like the album, or Paul Simon in general, but to complain about it on this forum seems juvenile. Even the most jaded audiophile must recognize that PS has given us a lot of great music during his career, even if it isn't your style.
My point is that although I DO like the album....it sounds much poorer on viny, with my big megabuck system with speakers than with the mp3 version trough a Denon receiver via AirPlay, and then through a pair of wireless Sennhiser earphones.  It really shouldn't....n'est pas???
Sorry, stringreen, but this thread went off track several postings go. I got your point about being disappointed about the sound through your MP3/ Sennheiser setup being superior to your vinyl rig. I wish I had the answer to your dilemma. What disturbed me was the echo of many voices saying, in effect, that Paul Simon's contribution to R&R music over the past 50 years is insignificant, or negligible. Seriously?

"Well, bad recording will of course sound bad on anything but it will still sound better with better equipment. You are talking nonsense."


Inna, I think that depends on the system.  Fact is, a lot of poor recordings will sound better on a boom box, headphones, and a car stereo than a high end two channel stereo system.  They can sound overly harsh, hard, thin and recessed on a high end system.  Sometimes with the right cabling and gear, those recordings can sound better on a high end system.  It just depends. 

Older guitarists tend to develop wrist arthritis and won't able to keep up with complex compositions they used to play. Steve Howe in his early 70's started showing symptoms earlier before when he couldn't play single clean note while John McLaughlin is still lightning fast and very clean. Segovia at his late career was suffering from the way he establish to position the right hand perpendicular to strings very often over-stressing wrist-arm joint. Yea, he couldn't play single note clean as well.
Check out John McLaughlin later band 4th-dimension -- pure blast!
Yeah, I know his 4th dimention. He still plays great but what he plays these days doesn't resonate with me.
You are right about Segovia. Generally, classical guitarists don't position their right hand in a natural way, unlike flamenco and jazz guitarists. They also elevate their left foot, strange as it is.
Kclone, when I listen to my system which is not very high end, my expectations are quite high. When I listen to youtube or cd on computer drive thru Grado headphones the expectations are low, so whatever sounds okay makes me happy. Any cd I have sounds incomparably better in my system than on computer.
Cabling of course is always very important, be it good or bad recording.
High end system is more difficult to make sound right than lower end one, that's for sure.
Older guitarists "tend" to develop wrist arthritis? Some might, but otherwise that is utter bullcrap, and to compare Clapton and Beck to Santana who, although arguably soulful, has never really had the chops of most great guitar players (saw his last show touring with McLaughlin in the 70s and it was sort of embarrassing to hear Carlos noodling along somehow)…Regardless of what people think of Clapton (listen to him playing stuff by his blues heroes and note how he utterly nails it on acoustics or fat Gibsons…amazing), he hasn’t lost anything except the desire to tour, and Jeff Beck is in a class of his own always touring and releasing new stuff, and absolutely blowing minds with his crazy inventive chops every damn night. I’ve been a pro guitar player since 1967…no arthritis and I play every day, and I’ve worked as a live sound tech/mixer for decades and in recent years have seen Larry Carlton play like he was 23, worked with the late John Renbourn who could give a clinic on acoustic technique in his 70s, Sonny Landreth, David Lindley, Robbin Ford (saw him a few months ago…amazing), John Scofield is a personal favorite, Bill Frisell is a genius, Stanley Clarke last year was astonishing…get out and see these guys before judging the geezers because you may find out where the mojo resides.
Wolf,
Different people have different aging.
My colleague is gigging musician in his 64 and his classical guitar skills are limited compared to decade ago. 
Steve Howe, all of a sudden, when he was 68 couldn't play a single note clean as he used to prior...

Inna,

In modern school of classical guitar the position of right wrist is free just like in jazz guitar. Check videos of Anna Vidovic or Emanuel Baruecco (who actually trained Anna). Also the clear genius of modern classical guitar is Rolan Dyens. He also keeps his right wrist free. Elevation of neck is to make right wrist perpendicular to the strings as one of the reasons.

Hey, anyways, thanks everyone for not comparing above mentioned musicians by wolf_ to Paul Simon after all.

Czarivey, I'll try Rolan, though I am not much into classical guitar. However, when someone plays real well I don't care about the style per se. Malmsteen has a great talent but he screwed up most of it. Some of his earlier neo-classical takes are very impressive.
Simon took a turn to Pablum Street when he went Afro-beat and won those undeserved Grammy's! Peter Gabriel did true African primal music with thought provoking lyrics on Security!  Awards?  Of course not...there for the accessible trendy hipster crowd...Simon blew his load early.
Graceland, even on chrome cassette (120 us), Dolby B in, that I found a mint-almost-unplayed copy of for $1 last week, sounds amazingly dynamic, warm, vocally musical, danceable & party-able. Good times.

And Dave: I agree that Peter early on included African forms in his music from the late 70’s through 80’s, albeit perhaps from a more progressive angle, but in so doing, he promoted awareness of rhythm and modern melodic content, influencing many musiciansingersongwriters, Paul included, to learn, share and collaborate.

Remember, there was Joni before Peter (Jungle Line), along with the Chambers Brothers (Time Has Come Today) and Grand Funk (Stop Looking Back). Others may identify additional examples.
Czarivey…read my previous post. First line. 

Less people would have been aware of African music without Simon's use of the African musicians like Ladysmith for clearly what were HIS songs, and remember that he also had the first U.S. commercial reggae hit with Mother and Child Reunion. He's also a great acoustic guitarist who learned a pile of stuff from the English masters like Bert Jansch in his early days. Graceland is considered by many musicians and others to be a masterpiece that's held up over time.
Wolf- I tend to like your taste in guitarists, but the measure for me isn't even chops, it is the ability to convey something that is emotionally affecting- I'm not sure there is a metric for that and it may be personal taste. For example, I went to hear Terry Reid a few years ago, and he used a local band- the guitarist had great countrified electric guitar fills that weren't "rote" and he didn't overplay, but when he came in, he was really tasty. 
Leslie West never really had "chops" but I always loved his playing on Mountain's "Theme for an Imaginary Western"--not just his tone either.
Lindley- yeah, total genius. 
I've been listening to some Davey Graham, who was a pretty influential guy for that whole crop of UK folk/psych guitarists, including Jansch and Renbourn.  

Wolf, couldn’t agree more with everything you said above. Sonny Landreth and David Lindley, two unfairly-overlooked guitarists. Bill Frisell’s recent Guitar in the Space Age album is a gas! Clapton’s playing just keeps getting deeper, and Beck is still without peer. I saw him on his first U.S. solo tour in ’68, and he’s even better now.

Robben Ford stopped in San Jose on his journey with his brothers (drums and mouth harp) from very Northern California to Los Angeles in the late 60’s, living and playing around town (and the whole Bay Area) for a couple of years, including with Charlie Musselwhite for awhile. Every guitarist I knew went to watch and listen to him play every chance they had, some of them almost quitting playing after hearing him. And that was over 45 years ago! He ended up playing with both George Harrison and Miles Davis; who else can say that?!

I don't understand what you people find in Beck, Frissell, Clapton and not mentioned Van Halen. Nothing really special to my ear. The best tune that I heard Beck perform was with John McLaughlin, it's called Django and McLaughlin's album is called The Promise. Not a very good album except for this composition and some other that I don't quite remember. By the way, Santana can groove, find his jam-sessions with McLaughlin and Miles Davis on youtube. His albums are very weak including famous Abraxas, some nice melodies though.
Also, listen to Reggie Lucas's solo on Pangaea by Miles Davis. Or is it by Pete Cosey, I am not sure? Great anyway.
Inna there's no bad albums with Bill Frisell. He's a dream of every jazz musician to play with.

Czarivey, I'll try Bill again, maybe I missed something. I know that John Scoffield is in high esteem as well, he played with late Miles, but...not for me either.
I must say that according to what I head, whoever played with either Miles Davis or John McLaughlin played their best. Both men have this unique talent, now that's leadership.
Going through Bill's early career in ECM there's no album that's not worth attention.
Going further collaborations with NYC underground artists is incredible with John Zorn, Fred Frith, David Torn
90's with Ginger Baker trio/Charlie Haden already should ring some bell indeed.
I also enjoy his master classes on sound setups -- he's a living legend of entire jazz history.
Identical guitarist is Eivind Aarset from Norway.


If anybody can't see the genius in Frissell I assume their taste is somewhat unsophisticated, or you might think jazz is "too many notes" or something, and it doesn't matter anyway as there's plenty of lighter fare to enjoy…Scofield, Ford, et al have certainly advanced beyond their days with Miles, who really was in an experimental era at the end, and much of what he was doing at that point wasn't particularly his best stuff...it was a weird era. A brilliant musician I knew from the Honolulu scene was in one of those bands…Benny Reitveld, who has played bass for 20 years or something with Santana (!). Go figure. These guys have proven themselves far beyond anybody who "doesn't get it," and if one can't appreciate something like Scofield's recent masterpiece "Past Present," with the utterly top of their game musicians Joe Lovano, Larry Grenadier, and Bill Stewart (3 of my absolute favorite players), I understand, but it's still kinda sad. 
Technologies have moved on. A receiver + Elac speaker + mogami cable is all you need.
I listen to music in my car either through a traditional original iPod 160gb or an Astell & Kern AK100. The differences between the sonics is night and day with the A&K obviously winning. There are many files shared between the two but I pretty much reserve the A&K for my jazz collection almost specifically for discovering Bill Frissel's work rather late in life. I have bought everything I could find of his stuff. 

Amazingly good stuff in every respect. 

The ipod cost $250, the A&K $900 - in this case a very worthy investment IMHO.  Thanks for some of the artists listed here whom I knew little about before - great learning new stuff!

Wolf, be nice my man musician. Assumption is the mother of all f...-ups
Czarivey, Dyens is certainly the most unusual sort of a classical guitarist. Very good.
Still not much liking of Frisell, nothing can do about it.

Taste is a very personal thing, not everyone has to like the same players. I find Van Halen to be a very unmusical player, but that’s just my taste. I prefer lyricism and subtlety in my playing. I part with most people in also not caring for Jimi Hendrix, surely VH’s major influence. Ry Cooder---now THERE’S a guitarist! Another too-infrequently mentioned player is Richard Thompson.

When Buddy Rich was going in the hospital as he was dying, the nurse asked him if there was anything he couldn’t take, meaning medicine of course. His reply was "Yeah. Country music". Not thought of as producing great musicians, that is an over-simplification. Ever heard Albert Lee’s playing?