I was listening to my VPI Traveler w/Zu DL-103 MkII in my system, pulled that ’table and transferred my Garrard 301/Ortofon AS-309 into it’s place using the same Zu cartridge. Everything else in the system was exactly the same. Immediately the idler drive 301 made its presence known. More slam, a much bigger impact, and a more precise speed were absolutely evident to begin with.I’m curious; why were you using a Traveler when you have a 301?
If you can’t tell the difference between an idler drive 301 and a belt drive Traveler in an identical system perhaps there’s something else going on.
I won’t even begin to speculate on the reasons for some of the red herring distractions that have been offered up on this thread in opposition.
What do you mean you “heard” the turntable
I don’t get it. Maybe I just don’t have the biological tool set, but I read all the time how someone heard this turntable or that turntable and they comment on how much better or worse it sounded than some other TT, presumably their own or one they are very familiar with.
Thing is, they are most likely hearing this set up on a completely different system in a completely different environment. So how can they claim it was the TT that made the difference? The way “synergy“ is espoused around here how can anybody be confident at all considering how interdependent system interactions are.
Can someone illuminate me?
Thing is, they are most likely hearing this set up on a completely different system in a completely different environment. So how can they claim it was the TT that made the difference? The way “synergy“ is espoused around here how can anybody be confident at all considering how interdependent system interactions are.
Can someone illuminate me?