What are we listening to...for...with?


As a long time audio enthusiast and former professional musician (double reeds) I'm interested in hearing opinions on a couple of related observations.

First obbo: A few years ago I had the privilege of visiting with the principal conductor of one of the major US symphonies--one of the biggest of the biggies. I was doubly blessed that among the guests was the music director of another orchestra in the same league. Between them, these guys probably account for a hundred or more recordings. I found my host relaxing by listening to his home equipment--an Aiwa all-in-one-box system that sounded to me like a miniature car crusher hard at work. When I questioned him, his offhand reply was, "Oh, I know what it is supposed to sound like." I pressed further: "So then are you listening for performance practice or interpretation or what?" "Nah," he replied, "I'm just enjoying the music." At which point the other internationally famous conductor chimed in to say that his home system was 30 year old HH Scott....

Second obbo: A few nights ago, I went to a friend's for an evening of listening. His system is primarily Krell electronics and a pair of Vienna Mahlers. Among other things, we heard the Slatkin/St. Louis/Telarc recording of the Vaughn Williams Fantasia on a Theme of Tallis, Barber Adagio for Strings, etc. Conversation ranged over several topics including Telarc engineering, "Krell sound," cables (what else?), and the suitability of the Mahlers for orchestral music. Finally I said, "Isn't anybody bothered by the crappy playing and conducting on this disc?" Blank looks all around. Finally, one friend, an oratorio singer, ventured, "Well, the strings WERE a bit out of tune on the Barber." Out of tune? They sounded like cats screwing on a tin roof! Slatkin failed to totally realize Grainger's luscious harmonies on the Tune from County Derry, and the playing throughout was tentative, almost hesitant.

My question for you folks: Are these observations two sides of a common coin? Do some of us listen only to the sound and others only to the music? Are these common phenomena? What's going on?
bishopwill

Showing 3 responses by sugarbrie

I have been to the home of Tom Hall, music director of the Balitmore Choral Arts Society and he just has a similar Circuit City type all-in-one box system. When talking with him (at other times), he will comment on various choral recording he likes or dislikes and specifically why. His comments are always technical from a performance perspective (interpretation, tempo, chorus blend, balance, etc) I think they are listening to these things (ie, the music) and the quality of the actual sound does not matter.
Given the choice of two CDs, one with better sound and one with a better performance I always choose the better performance. This in one reason while it will be a very long time before I get a SACD player. I review the list of available recordings every once in a while and there is still only one CD I would buy. Except for the redbook one of this recording also sounds great as is. So maybe buy none.
Bishop: I recently removed a Nordost Quattro Fil (a $1600 per meter) interconnect in favor of a $250 Blue Circle BC95 between my preamp and power amp. The Quattro is much better than the BC95 technically from an audiophile's perspective (top to bottom detail, etc). It is hard to explain, but my musician side of the brain tells me that the BC95 simple just "sounds right".