Vibration isolation for Io Callisto?

Just purchased the Aesthetix Callisto to go along with the Io I had recently aquired. I simply plopped 'em down on my existing racks, corian sandboxes and Black Diamond cones without experimentation. What have other users found to work best? I've recieved much useful info regarding nos tube swapping on these units via the threads & individuals on this site. Very much appreciated! Now I'm looking for some direction/concensus on the isolation thing. Has anything been previously covered in this vein? Also, what about powercords/conditioning? I have a number of the Canadian-made Foundation LC1's that I run on all front end components. These dedicated (one-per-component)line conditioner/cords have worked so well on all previous pieces of gear that I've went ahead and plugged the Cal' & Io into 'em too. I suppose I should try pluggin' them in with the stock cords too but is there other cords/conditioners out there which could unseat my in'house reigning champ? Your opinions are welcome.
Why don't you e-mail Albert Porter. He is the most knowledgeable A'diogoner as far as the Aesthetix's are concerend and besides that a true gentleman and a very kind and helpful person.
Thank you for the compliment Detlof.

Vince. I would be surprised if the electrical isolation you mention is not degrading the Io. Every device I tested provided negative results in my system. The large Accuphase was one of the best, but limited the total dynamic range in addition to being extremely expensive. Depending on your location and the quality of your electrical service, your results may vary.

All of my Aesthetix gear is powered through Purist Audio Dominus power cords. They have consistently out performed every other cable. My testing included, but was not limited to: MIT, Audioquest, Power Snakes, Synergistic, Music Meter, Tiffany, Tara Labs, TG Audio and three hospital/shielded grade cables. I am about to test a new heavy gauge power cord from Vantage Audio and will report when I have conclusive results.

As far as the Black Diamond cones, I have had less than stellar results with these. The Io is an extremely high gain all tube phono and is highly sensitive to both mechanical and airborne vibration. Most of the cone type isolation devices provided marginal resistance to microphonics and added an unnatural brilliance to the upper mid and/or upper high frequencies.

My isolation evolved from more than two years testing and finalized with an extremely ridged 6061 aircraft aluminum stand that was TIG welded, Nextel coated and partially filled with Silica. The stand is four cylinders, quarter inch thick walls with twelve cross braces ( three per side) and has three quarter inch aluminum discs welded into each cylinder ( top and bottom ). All eight discs are bored and threaded to use a one half inch diameter tempered stainless steel spike ( NF thread, 45 degree point ). I use only the bottom spikes, as the top ones were a sonic failure.

On top of each of the four cylinders are McCormack Audio Soft Shoes placed upside down from their usual orientation. Atop that is a piece of polished natural Granite ( 17" X 22" X 2" ), and between the granite and the Io are fourteen of the small IsoBearings ( 2 Kg rating each ) by AudioPrism. On top of the Io are three of the Walker lead and copper disks, ( one thick and two thin ) with the optional leather damper between the disk and the Io's top plate. The two power supplies ( probably one in your case) are not as critical as they do not contain the primary audio amplification tubes and RIAA equalization circuitry.

Using the smaller IsoBearings in such quantity provide extraordinary isolation from both airborne and floor vibrations. Other devices tried here were the Walker Valid Points ( with and without the lead discs/both thicknesses and with and without leather damper ), Mod Squad Tip Toes, Purist Pyramids, the large IsoBearings, Black Diamond Racing (#4, #5, #6), Sound Anchor Cones, Goldman Cones, Simply Physics cones (all three types), Carbon Blocks, Mod Squad Soft Shoes, AQ Sorbothane (Navcom), E.A.R. TAD, Audio Points, Symposium Roller Blocks (with upgrade tungsten bearings), and the Neuance shelf ( with and without most of the above cones).

As with all isolation, the results are judged by a combination of the room and the system. Interactions with your acoustic environment, your foundation ( slab or suspended floor ), the sound pressure level, the microphonic tendencies of the tubes you select and the tonal balance and tuning present from your other equipment.

In short, you will need to test multiple isolation devices in your own system to determine what works in your situation. I will reply to direct questions at this post or by private email. I am also willing to spend time with you on the phone if that is more comfortable than typing.
Albert, this time you have truly outdone yourself and I've learnt a lot for myself. Thankyou. I'm very happy with my IO, which I use together with my Jadis gear. The Jadis is still better in dynamics, but for the rest, soundstage, layering, resolution, pristine highs and tight bass rendering, the IO is in a league by itself. Your twofold powersupply, I suppose, does not have this slight failing in dynamics. Is this mod still being done?
By the way, in the question of RR ablutions, I've posted my latest finding under "record cleaning rituals". Perhaps they are of interest.
Detlof. Yes the dual power supply is still available, and soon the Signature version that features upgraded parts including new capacitors and wire. All are important to the dynamics and tonal balance and cannot be overstated. The dual power supplies with tube substitutions are remarkable in what they can do for dynamics and contrast. This mod may be performed in the field with a proper technical info sheet and a second Aesthetix power supply (by the technically inclined).

The exercise in isolation I posted about should not be overlooked. Even the smallest amount of misplaced energy in a tube unit clouds the contrast, dynamics and resolution.