UX-3 vs UX-1 or other Hi-Rez player?


Well the UX-3 is out in Tokyo. Might have to be among the first to take the plunge.

I did not have time to study the specs closely but appears very similar to UX-1, without BNC, which I don't need.

I already have a G08 for redbook, mainly on the lookout for a Hi-rez player(DVD-A, SACD). But perhaps will trade the G08 in for an all around performer. Maybe keep both? If the UX-3 does not keep up in Redbook. The G08 does play MP3s, while not a major decider nice to have coz can pop in a MP3 mix for several hours of music. Think romantic evening and you will see that high quality audio can be sacrificed for not having to switch CDs. But I have a cheap DVD player which does MP3s for this minor but useful purpose. Though even MP3s, EAC/Xtreme, sound very pleasing on G08.

I was going to just get the DV-50s, and pair with my G08, which has better Redbook IMHO. But folks have noted that the UX-1 had notably better Hi-rez than DV-50, Neo-VRS too. I did not find the UX-1 redbook better* than G08, perhaps comparable mmm maybe not, and UX-1 was kind of out of my spending threshhold last year when I settled on the G08. But a year has passed and hoping bonus will afford an upgrade.

Damn I still have not played all my records with the new Loricraft.

* Note - When I say better, I mean to my liking! Others results will vary.
spinitch

Showing 2 responses by emile

Scott
According to this web site, that shows the UX-3 rear :
http://www.phileweb.com/products/esoteric/2.html
it has a Wordclock input.

But there's no "5.1" ouputs only Stereo/Front ...
A external processor might be mandatory, via I-Link, to be able to listen to get the surround, center, woofer channels ...