Upgrade sugestion please


So i have a pair of paradigm studio 20v5(sealed),separate around 2 inches from the back wall(is all as possible) matched with a martin Logan sub(sealed), my room is around 11x21x,10 and is a bright room. I like most of the presentation except for the highs which are a bit grainy and bright. I tried the signature s2v3 in my room ,although it was too bright, I love how clean it was the beryllium tweeter.
so basically I am looking to eliminate the harsh and sibilance sound on my next speakers. Don’t care too much on bass because the sub will handle them.
So based on reviews and forums I think that the atc scm 7v3 is the solution, but I wonder if the Kef would be a better choice (livelier, funnier)
My fears from each one are:
Atc,: maybe too laid back? Less detail compared with the paradigm?lesser live presentation, image, ,?
Kef: is an aluminum tweeter as the paradigm! Probably not as clean as I want ? Less clean than the atc?
As a reference I have heard some totems the dreamcatcher, the hawk , too bright for me, the element line was great tough, but out of my budget, and for me it doesn’t worth those price anyway.
So please I need opinions from people have experience with them.
Btw I will improve to a emotiva a300 amplifier in any case. (Considering also the parasound a23 and nuprime sta9)
Thanks!!

128x128alfau7

Showing 3 responses by itzhak1969

If have I to choose between this two I would defently buy the ATC which consider to be very neutral and natural a little bit on the analytical side but very good overall.
Regarding the KEF LS50 I didn’t listen to them but if you Google on other forums there are many owners that were disappointed from them ,they don’t handle bass very well, don’t go deep enogh on the low frequencies  and tend to be very bright.
I agree , you should consider floor standing Speakers with the right choice you will not need a sub.
Don't buy the Emotiva there're nuch better options for amp upgrade.