2. digital
  3. 149453-120364

Unfiltered NOS DACs sound

I Have been experimenting with some NOS DAC chips and redbook material.
I very much like the NOS sound, and frankly think in terms of transparency it trumps any of the modern DS DACs Ive heard. The biggest drawback is THD and noise levels, on paper the modern chips out perform the older NOS chips and I think thats easy to hear but its superior ability to preserve of timing and spatial information in the music makes that problem relatively insignificant.

I have experimented with high quality software based upsampling, the conclusion is that any form of oversampling loses the ’’special’’ NOS sound.

Steep analogue filters did not affect transparency as much as software digital filtering, but the sound became dull and lacking vibrancy. I would choose the ’’processed’’ digitally filtered sound over this dull analogue filtered sound any day, but still NOS remains sounding the best.
I tried gentler (simpler circuit) analogue filters and more extended (filtering higher into the ultrasonic range), and the gains from the filters were never worth the filters influence on audible frequencies.

So as it stands the best sound I can achieve with these NOS chips is with a raw unfiltered PCM output.
The artifacts within unfiltered 44.1kHz PCM are very significant but ultrasonic, so it seems that the audible influence of this ultrasonic noise has on the system is not as siginificant as the means of removing it.... but this is probably not true in all systems.

What amazes me the most is that this is with redbook material... DS DACs and upsampling are supposed to be the more advanced methods of dealing with the limitations of 16 bit 44.1kHz data.
Unfiltered NOS naturally seems the most transparent and accurate way of experiencing Hi Res DXD and 192kHz material.

I know that unfiltered NOS has a sort of cult following, are there any other fans of it here?

suix6
roxy54's avatar
roxy54
7,651 posts
 
suix6,
Completely agree with you. I think those who haven't tried R2R DACs are really missing out on more natural sound. I would never go back.
lowrider57's avatar
lowrider57
5,393 posts
 
My search ended when I purchased an Audio Note DAC2.1x Signature. It's NOS with absolutely no filters.

An 18Bit Analogue Devices chip is used (it's preferred over the 20 bit). In addition, there is a tube gain stage and tube rectification, and transformers are custom built in-house.
This dac accepts 44.1, 48, and  96KHz sample rates. 

It's been a transformational part of my audio rig.


toneranger58
124 posts
 
Absolutely love my Schiit Yggdrasil A2. Has put digital listening on par with vinyl, still different but as enjoyable. Have also experienced great benefit from upgraded power cord for the Yggy.
audioman58's avatar
audioman58
3,838 posts
 
There are a lot of factors , for example my Belcanto dac has
2 Femto clocks -that is Trillions, older dacs are in picoseconds. ,  much much better accuracy 
reading the digital signal , power supplies also Very critical 
seperate very low noise for analog as well as digital signals very 
important , and many other things . My New 2.7 dac sounds very much like the older types, smooth very musical and still very accurate. It is all about the implementation. Many companies 
do digital but not all are musically involving.
abraxalito
93 posts
 
I also use a DIY TDA1387 DAC but my findings are rather different from yours @suix6. I've found analog filters improve the sound - best if the filter comes prior to the I/V stage. Could be I'm using different filters - LC (passive) ones.The improvement passive filtering brings is in the focus - somehow the instruments are rather ill-defined in the soundstage without a filter, they become more clearly delineated when the filter's included. Overall dynamics improves a fair amount too.
I'm still experimenting with I/V stages as these are perhaps the most critical part of a NOS DAC as regards subjective performance.
More to discover