Tube selection

Dekay. We are based in Australia, so it is probably not practical to recommend our Tube Amp. I will be happy to email you some details on it in PDF format if you provide me with your email address. I can show you the basic Amplifier Circuit, No Component Values, a picture and the specs. Thereis also a little bit about it on our web page, www.elan.com.au.

As a designer of Professional Broadcast Audio Equipment, I am surprised about the discussions about Tube Sound. The characteristics of individual Tubes and Transistors of the same type vary by a very considerable margin. In good design, it is not good practise to rely on the specified characteristics of a particular active component such as for example a Tube. Instead, the design should allow for wide variations in gain, and be arranged to compensate for this. I have recently designed a Professional Valve Power Amplifier for serious Monitoring using ECC82/12AU7 in the driver circuitry. The design use generous Cathode Degeneration. Ie. what is known in solid state Amplifiers as nested or local feedback. Testing about 25 ECC82/12AU7 Tubes of various makes and ages, some used, I found no significant differences in overall performance of the amplifier, no doubt thanks to the way the Tubes were applied. An Amplifier relying on precise performance characteristics of Tubes or Transistors for that matter is badly designed. The Professonal Amplifier mentioned use either KT88 or 6550 Tubes in its output stages. There is practically no measured difference in performance between KT88 and 6550 Tubes except for overload behaviour. As expected, the 6550 Tubes produce marginally more power and overload more abruptly than the KT88 with the KT88's sonicly being more pleasant because of their softer overload behaviour. This is understandable and as expected considering Beam tetrodes versus Pentodes. I can see no reason for differences in sound quality between healthy Tubes used in low level stages other than poor or bad design of the circuitry in the first place.