Not exactly. Nelson Pass is famous however for noting that too many amplifier makers focus on the extremes of power delivery, and not enough reviewers, specs or designers worry about the linearity, quietness, etc. of the very first watt.
Tube Physics Question
At least I think it's Physics.
Short version: Is it logical that going to a less powerful power tube in an amp can yield better dynamics? What's the Physics behind tube design/operation and their ability to reproduce the swing of musical dynamics? What part does bias play?
Longer version: A couple of years ago I acquired a used tube amp for a second system. It came with three sets of power tubes - the original KT88s, a set of Gold Lion KT88s and a set of Tung Sol KT120s. The amp had been biased for the 120s, and those are what I used and have been happy with. More power = better, right?
Recently I swapped out the speakers in that system for a more efficient and transparent pair. While the change was nice and an obvious speaker upgrade, I started hearing a little edginess in the treble. Since I'd never checked the bias I put a meter on it and found it low (avg ~12mV vs. a recommended 45-50mV for KT120s). Running the pots up to max only reached ~35mV, but it did improve the sound. Called the mfr and he said not to worry about a lower bias setting, as it made little difference.
Not content, I swapped out the KT120s for the Gold Lion KT88s, checked/reset bias to 35mV (recommended for 88s) and wow, what an improvement they made. Without getting into a bunch of hyperbole, what was immediately and most noticeable was the increase in dynamics. So my question is, what about the design/production and implementation of a tube affects its ability to reproduce dynamics? Or is it more likely that running a lower power tube at relatively higher bias causes the effect?
Short version: Is it logical that going to a less powerful power tube in an amp can yield better dynamics? What's the Physics behind tube design/operation and their ability to reproduce the swing of musical dynamics? What part does bias play?
Longer version: A couple of years ago I acquired a used tube amp for a second system. It came with three sets of power tubes - the original KT88s, a set of Gold Lion KT88s and a set of Tung Sol KT120s. The amp had been biased for the 120s, and those are what I used and have been happy with. More power = better, right?
Recently I swapped out the speakers in that system for a more efficient and transparent pair. While the change was nice and an obvious speaker upgrade, I started hearing a little edginess in the treble. Since I'd never checked the bias I put a meter on it and found it low (avg ~12mV vs. a recommended 45-50mV for KT120s). Running the pots up to max only reached ~35mV, but it did improve the sound. Called the mfr and he said not to worry about a lower bias setting, as it made little difference.
Not content, I swapped out the KT120s for the Gold Lion KT88s, checked/reset bias to 35mV (recommended for 88s) and wow, what an improvement they made. Without getting into a bunch of hyperbole, what was immediately and most noticeable was the increase in dynamics. So my question is, what about the design/production and implementation of a tube affects its ability to reproduce dynamics? Or is it more likely that running a lower power tube at relatively higher bias causes the effect?